HEINBERG BROTHERS, A CORPORATION, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR,
v.
H. W. THOMPSON, F. C. CHAFFIN, E. L. CREARY AND J. E. CREARY, DEFENDANTS IN ERROR

Fla. | 1903-06-01
46 Fla. 242 Florida Supreme Court (1903) Caution
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam.

Per Curiam.

This cause coming on for final adjudication before Division A of the courj upon the transcript of the record and briefs of counsel for the respective parties, upon due consideration the court finds that there was no final judgment rendered in said cause from which writ of error would lie, and it is, therefore, hereby considered, ordered and adjudged that the writ of error in said cause be, and the same is hereby, dismissed at the cost of the plaintiff in error. Harrison v. Thruston, 11 Fla. 307; Gates v. Hayner, 22 Fla. 325, and authorities cited therein; Johnson, Daniels & Co. v. Polk County, 24 Fla. 28, 3 South. Rep. 414.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • In re Investigation of a Circuit Judge of the Eleventh Judicial Circuit of Florida, 93 So. 2d 601 (Fla. 1957)
    …Florida Bar” in good standing, that a Circuit Judge in Florida is not permitted to practice law and consequently cannot be an active member of the bar and cannot qualify as a member of The Florida Bar in the capacity of attorney. See Perry v. Bush, 46 Fla. 242, 35 So. 225. Inspection of applicable provision of the Constitution discloses that judgment in case of impeachment consists only in removal from office and disqualification to hold any office of honor, trust or profit under the state but the party…
  • The State of Fla. ex rel. Fred H. Davis v. Giblin, 98 Fla. 802 (Fla. 1929)
    …by the Governor of the Honorable George W. Tedder to be judge of that circuit; the date and terms of the commission issued to him and the confirmation of his appointment by the Senate. See State v. Bloxham, 42 Fla. 501, 28 So. R. 762; Perry v. Bush, 46 Fla. 242, 35 So. R. 225; State v. Phillips, 64 Fla. 105, 59 So. R. 241; Brown v. Harley, 2 Fla. 159; Charlotte Harbor & N. R. Co. v. Welles, 78 Fla. 227, 82 So. R. 770; Amos v. Gunn, 84 Fla. 285, 94 So. R. 615; 7 Ency. of Ev. 947-974-978-980; De La Rosa v. S…
  • Morrison v. McCaskill, 46 Fla. 233 (Fla. 1903)
    …, 3 South. Rep. 414; Hall v. Patterson, 45 Fla. 353, 33 South. Rep. 982; Haynes v. Bramlett, 46 Fla. supra; 35 South. Rep. 982; Birmingham Trust & Savings Co. v. Jackson County Mill Co., 46 Fla. 236, 35 South. Rep. — ; Heinberg Brothers v. Thompson, 46 Fla. 242, 35 South. Rep. —; Marsh v. Bennett, 46 Fla. 241, 35 South. Rep. —. Taylor, C. J., and Hocker and Shackleford, JJ., concur. Carter, P. J., and Maxwell and Cockrell, JJ., concur in the opinion.…

Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw