OHIO CASUALTY INSURANCE COMPANY, APPELLANT,
v.
OAKHURST HOMES, INC., AND ABACO ALUMINUM COMPANY, INC., APPELLEES
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
A surety bond company cannot be held liable for judgments exceeding the bond amount; the trial court erred in imposing joint and several liability beyond the bond's face value.
A surety company's liability on a mechanics lien bond cannot exceed the bond amount plus costs and attorney's fees not to exceed $100.
[1] A surety company's liability on a mechanics lien bond is limited to the bond amount plus costs and attorney's fees not exceeding $100, and a trial court cannot increase t…
Previewing 1 of 1 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceOhio Casualty Insurance Company issued a surety bond in the amount of $12,850.70 to which mechanics lien claims were transferred. The trial court foun…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Surety Liability cases and more on FLexlaw
LEHAN, Judge.
An insurance company which issued the surety bond to which mechanics lien claims were transferred appeals from an order finding the company liable for an amount in excess of the amount of the bond. We reverse.
The order from which this appeal is taken states that the company is jointly and severally liable, together with the principals on the bond, to pay judgments totaling $25,504.92. However, it is undisputed that the amount of the bond was $12,850.70. Appellant and appellees concede that the amount of costs and attorney’s fees for which the surety company could be held liable in excess of the amount of the bond could not exceed $100. See Gulfstream Pump & Equipment Co. v. Grosvenor Development, Inc., 487 So. 2d 330 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986). Upon the lienholder’s filing of a motion to increase security pursuant to section 713.24(3), Florida Statutes (1985), a trial court can order the party providing the bond to purchase either an additional bond or an increase in the existing bond, or to otherwise provide increased security for the loan. The trial court cannot, as it did in this case, increase the liability of the security company beyond the amount of the bond. See Gulfstream Pump. We do not conclude that Brickell Bay Club, Inc. v. Ussery, 417 So. 2d 692 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982), is to the contrary.
Reversed and remanded for proceedings consistent herewith.
RYDER, A.C.J., and SCHOONOVER, J., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Taylor Indus. Constr., Inc. v. Westfield Ins. Co. (M.D. Fla. 2020)
Authorities Cited
- Brickell BAY Club, Inc. v. Pansy K. Ussery, 417 So. 2d 692 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982)
- Gulfstream Pump & Equip. Co. v. Grosvenor Dev., Inc., 487 So. 2d 330 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986)