STEVE MICHAEL BEYLUND, PETITIONER,
v.
GRANT LEVI, DIRECTOR, NORTH DAKOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION.
STEVE MICHAEL BEYLUND, PETITIONER,
GRANT LEVI, DIRECTOR, NORTH DAKOTA DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION.
136 S. Ct. 614
Supreme Court of the United States (2015)
Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 193 L. Ed. 2d 495
Cited by 15 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Ross v. Shaidon Blake., 136 S. Ct. 1850 (U.S. 2016)…aint from the typical ARP process." Id., at 700. Judge Agee dissented, stating that the PLRA's mandatory exhaustion requirement is not "amenable" to "[j]udge-made exceptions." Id., at 703. This Court granted certiorari. 577 U.S. ----, 136 S.Ct. 614, 193 L.Ed.2d 495 (2015). II The dispute here concerns whether the PLRA's exhaustion requirement, § 1997e(a), bars Blake's suit. Statutory text and history alike foreclose the Fourth Circuit's adoption of a "special circumstances" exception to that mandate. But Bla…
-
Birchfield v. North Dakota. William Robert Bernard, Jr., 136 S. Ct. 2160 (U.S. 2016)…he court emphasized that North Dakota's implied consent advisory was not misleading because it truthfully related the penalties for refusal. Id., at 606. We granted certiorari in all three cases and consolidated them for argument, see 577 U.S. ----, 136 S.Ct. 614, 193 L.Ed.2d 494 (2015), in order to decide whether motorists lawfully arrested for drunk driving may be convicted of a crime or otherwise penalized for refusing to take a warrantless test measuring the alcohol in their bloodstream. III As our summa…
-
Jones v. Comm'r, Ga. Dep't OF Corr., Warden, Ga. Diagnostic & Classification Prison, Other Unknown Emps. & Agents, 811 F.3d 1288 (11th Cir. 2016)…tiorari. Welbns v. Owens, — U.S. -, 134 S.Ct. 2838, 189 L.Ed.2d 803 (2014). We reapplied this holding and rejected another identical claim in Terrell, 807 F. 3d at 1276, and again the Supreme Court denied certiorari, Terrell v. Bryson, 577 U.S. -, 136 S.Ct. 614, 193 L.Ed.2d 494 (2015). Under our Circuit’s prior precedent rule, we are bound to follow a prior binding precedent “unless and until it is overruled by this court en banc or by the Supreme Court.” United States v. VegarCastillo, 540 F. 3d 1235, 1…
Previewing 3 of 6 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence