PRENTISS B. DAVIS, PETITIONER,
v.
THE BOEING COMPANY, ET AL.
PRENTISS B. DAVIS, PETITIONER,
THE BOEING COMPANY, ET AL.
136 S. Ct. 821
Supreme Court of the United States (2016)
Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 193 L. Ed. 2d 766
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Inquiry Concerning a Judge, 212 So. 3d 291 (Fla. 2017)…ate pre-judicial acts and recommend to this Court the removal (for unfitness) or reprimand (for misconduct) of a sitting judge.” (alteration in original) (quoting In re Davey, 645 So. 2d 398, 403 (Fla. 1994))), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 136 S.Ct. 863, 193 L.Ed.2d 766 (2016). The Hearing Panel’s Findings also noted that Judge Decker agreed that some of his conduct was in violation of the various rules and canons. Based on Judge Decker’s admissions and [*298] the evidence presented, the Hearing Panel found Judge…
-
Inquiry Concerning a Judge No. 15-200 re John Patrick Contini, 205 So. 3d 1281 (Fla. 2016)…e [JQC].” Art. V, § 12(c)(1), Fla. Const. This Court reviews JQC findings to ensure that there is clear and . convincing evidence to support the alleged misconduct. In re Watson, 174 So. 3d 364, 368 (Fla.2015), cert. denied, — U.S. —, 136 S.Ct. 863, 193 L.Ed.2d 766 (2016). When the respondent judge “admits to wrongdoing and the JQC’s findings are undisputed, this Court will ordinarily conclude that the JQC’s findings are supported by clear and convincing evidence.” In re Collins, 195 So. 3d 1129, 1132 (Fla.201…