JAMES JOSEPH HAAG, APPELLANT,

v.

STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Citator

Cited By

• Vermon T. Donald v. State, 562 So. 2d 792 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990)
  …ardless of whether the correction involves an increase. Brown v. State, 521 So. 2d 110 (Fla.1988); Fasenmyer v. State, 457 So. 2d 1361 (Fla.1984); Beech v. State, 436 So. 2d 82 (Fla.1983); Troupe v. Rowe, 283 So. 2d 857 (Fla.1973); Daniels v. State, 513 So. 2d 244 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987); Padgett v. State, 497 So. 2d 724 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986); Andrews v. State, 357 So. 2d 489 (Fla. 1st DCA 1978); and Flowers v. State, 351 So. 2d 387 (Fla. 1st DCA 1977); see also, Annot., 28 ALR4 147 (1984); Annot., 26 ALR4 905 (1983…
• King v. State, 648 So. 2d 183 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994)
  …a. 5th DCA 1991); see Wright v. State, 599 So. 2d 179 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992) (holding habitual offender sentence could not be imposed once service of guidelines sentence had begun); Williams v. State, 553 So. 2d 729 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989); Daniels v. State, 513 So. 2d 244 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987). Neither the adoption of the guidelines nor the decision in United States v. DiFrancesco, 449 U.S. 117, 101 S.Ct. 426, 66 L.Ed.2d 328 (1980) amended the Florida Constitution. See Traylor v. State, 596 So. 2d 957 (Fla. 1992). On t…
• Wright v. State, 599 So. 2d 179 (Fla. 2d DCA 1992)
  …appeal is whether Wright’s first sentence was a legal sentence. If it was, double jeopardy prevents the trial court from imposing a harsher sentence at a subsequent hearing. See Williams v. State, 553 So. 2d 729 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989); Daniels v. State, 513 So. 2d 244 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987). Allen held that if a defendant is adjudged to be a habitual offender, then the trial court must impose the sentence set forth in the habitual offender statute. This court, however, receded from Allen in King v. State, 597 So. 2d…