EDWARD GARY GREENBERG, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Adjudication Of Guilt cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
This is an appeal of the trial court’s order denying appellant’s motion to suppress evidence seized after he was stopped by a police officer. The appeal filed is timely and is properly before us. We conclude that the trial court committed no error in denying appellant’s motion for su-pression of evidence, and accordingly, we affirm the trial court’s judgment.
We do, however, remand the case to the trial court for correction of the order of probation entered on count three of the amended information to reflect that appellant was adjudicated guilty and placed on two years’ probation for the offense of possession of a controlled substance as charged in count three, rather than carrying a concealed firearm as now appears on the order. In all other respects, the orders of probation entered on counts one, two, and three of the amended information are affirmed.
These corrections may be made without the necessity of appellant appearing before the trial court.
CAMPBELL, A.C.J., HALL, J., and BOARDMAN, EDWARD F., (Ret.) J., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Peoples GAS Sys., Inc. v. Peoples First Nat'l Bank of N. Miami Beach, 556 So. 2d 1170 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990)…PER CURIAM. Affirmed. Wesley Construction Co. v. Lane, 323 So. 2d 649 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975); Vogel Bros. Building Co. v. Scarborough Constructors, Inc., 513 So. 2d 260 (Fla. 2nd DCA 1987); Publix Super Markets, Inc. v. Cheesbro Roofing, Inc., 502 So. 2d 484 (Fla. 5th DCA 1987).…
-
Pozo v. Roadhouse Grill, Inc., 790 So. 2d 1255 (Fla. 5th DCA 2001)…eement and lacks standing to enforce it. See Publix Super Markets, Inc. v. Cheesbro Roofing, Inc., 502 So. 2d 484, 488 (Fla. [*1261] 5th DCA 1987), superceded, by statute on other grounds, and Vogel Bros. Bldg. Co. v. Scarborough Constructors, Inc., 513 So. 2d 260, 262 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987). Second, no Florida cases have adopted this federal jurisprudence. Third, the target defendant in the underlying litigation, Humana, specifically waived its right to have the suit brought in Orange County under the contract.…
-
Civix Sunrise v. Sunrise Rd. Maint. Ass'n, Inc., 997 So. 2d 433 (Fla. 2d DCA 2008)…not mean that the injured party could enforce “any and every” provision of the insurance contract, but rather that they could enforce provisions that were intended to inure to their benefit); Vogel Bros. Bldg. Co. v. Scarborough Constructors, Inc., 513 So. 2d 260 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987) (concluding that a third party could not invoke the arbitration provision of a contract where the record did not suggest that the contracting parties intended it to benefit from the arbitration provision). While the appellees esta…
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence