REBECCA FRIEDRICHS, ET AL., PETITIONERS
v.
CALIFORNIA TEACHERS ASSOCIATION, ET AL.
REBECCA FRIEDRICHS, ET AL., PETITIONERS
CALIFORNIA TEACHERS ASSOCIATION, ET AL.
136 S. Ct. 1083
Supreme Court of the United States (2016)
Negative Treatment
Also reported at: 194 L. Ed. 2d 255
Cited by 10 cases
Per_curiam
The judgment is affirmed by an equally divided Court.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Carpenter v. United States, 138 S. Ct. 2206 (U.S. 2018)
-
Birchfield v. North Dakota. William Robert Bernard, Jr., 136 S. Ct. 2160 (U.S. 2016)
-
Janus v. Am. Fed'n OF State, 138 S. Ct. 2448 (U.S. 2018)…rent contexts, and in three recent cases, we have considered the standard that should be used in judging the constitutionality of agency fees. See Knox, supra ; Harris, supra ; Friedrichs v. California Teachers Assn., 578 U.S. ----, 136 S.Ct. 1083, 194 L.Ed.2d 255 (2016) (per curiam ) (affirming decision below by equally divided Court). In Knox, the first of these cases, we found it sufficient to hold that the conduct in question was unconstitutional under even the test used for the compulsory subsidization…1 / 3
Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence