DELORIS WILLIAMSON, APPELLANT,
v.
HALIFAX HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER, SELF INSURED, APPELLEE
DELORIS WILLIAMSON, APPELLANT,
HALIFAX HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER, SELF INSURED, APPELLEE
513 So. 2d 725
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1987)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 6 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Claimant/Williamson appeals from an order of the deputy commissioner deauthoriz-ing Dr. Wylie, the claimant’s treating psychiatrist, who had treated the claimant for a period of five years. Measured by the standard articulated in Cal Koven’s Construction v. Lott, 473 So. 2d 249 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985) and Gephart v. Certified Grocers, 482 So. 2d 420 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985), the order, insofar as it deauthorized Dr. Wylie, is not supported by competent, substantial evidence and is therefore REVERSED.
MILLS, ERVIN and NIMMONS, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Metro. Dade Cnty. v. Norton, 543 So. 2d 1301 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989)…he evidence. In an action for false arrest, “what facts and circumstances amount to probable cause is a question of law for the court, but whether a certain set of facts and circumstances exist is a question of fact for the jury.” Morton v. Gardner, 513 So. 2d 725, 727 n. 5 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987), rev. denied, 525 So. 2d 879 (Fla.1988), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 109 S.Ct. 305, 102 L.Ed.2d 324 (1988). The relevant facts here are not at issue; Norton admitted that littering occurred, and it is uncon-troverted that De…
-
Pondella Hall FOR Hire, Inc. v. Lawson Lamar, 866 So. 2d 719 (Fla. 5th DCA 2004)…ered it returned to its owner. In so finding, the court noted that the property owner was not seeking damages for the time the truck was held during the pen-dency of the forfeiture case. An earlier case did address this issue. In Morton v. Gardner, 513 So. 2d 725 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987), the third district held that a property owner is not entitled to bring a takings claim for loss of use during the pendency of a lawful, but unsuccessful forfeiture action. It based its decision first on the ground that there was…
-
Gailyn W. Wheeler v. Finlay Corbin, 546 So. 2d 723 (Fla. 1989)…d be detrimental to the public interest, since public officers would be discouraged from performing their duties conscientiously.” Sponder v. Brickman, 214 So. 2d 631, 632 (Fla. 3d DCA 1968). As the Third District Court noted in Morton v. Gardner, 513 So. 2d 725, 728 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987), review denied, 525 So. 2d 879 (Fla.), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 109 S.Ct. 305, 102 L.Ed.2d 324 (1988), the forfeiture process also has two steps: (1) seizure, the validity of which depends on the presence of probable cause to…
Previewing 3 of 6 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- CAL Kovens Constr. & United States Fid. & Guar. Co. v. Lott, 473 So. 2d 249 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985)
- Gephart v. Certified Grocers, 482 So. 2d 420 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985)