HOFMANN PAULEY & ASSOCIATES, INC., APPELLANT,
v.
JULIA GARCES, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Venue is proper in the county where the cause of action accrued or where the corporation has an office for transacting business.
[1] Venue for an action against a Florida corporation is proper in the county where the cause of action accrued or where the corporation has an office for transacting busines…
[2] The county where a contract is repudiated is the county where the cause of action for breach of contract accrues for venue purposes.
Previewing 2 of 3 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceA sales representative sued her employer, a Florida corporation with its principal place of business in Seminole County, for breach of contract in Dad…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Principal Place Of Business cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Hofmann Pauley & Associates, Inc. (HP & A) appeals from an order denying its motion to transfer venue from Dade County to Seminole County. We reverse.
Garces, a resident of Dade County, was employed by HP & A as a sales representative for the Dade County area pursuant to an employment contract. HP & A, a Florida corporation, has its principal place of business in Seminole County. When HP & A terminated the contract prior to its expiration date, Garces filed suit in the Circuit Court of Dade County claiming breach of contract. HP & A moved to change the venue to Seminole County.
In an action against a Florida corporation, venue is proper in the county where the cause of action accrued or where, the corporation has an office for transacting business. § 47.051, Fla.Stat. (1985).
Since HP & A’s sole business office is in Seminole County and the cause of action for breach of contract accrued in Seminole County, the place where the contract was repudiated, venue is proper only in Seminole County. See Mendez v. George Hunt, Inc., 191 So. 2d 480 (Fla. 4th DCA 1966).
Although Garces included a claim for monies owed in one of the paragraphs of her one-count complaint, that claim is not the gravamen of the complaint and is, therefore, not determinative of the proper venue. See Earl W. Shomber & Co. v. Florida Casino Assoc., 469 So. 2d 936 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985) (failure to transfer funds pursuant to an escrow agreement constitutes a breach of contract; no debtor/creditor relationship created for purpose of determining venue); American Fidelity Fire Ins. Co. v. Allied Gen. Contractors, Inc., 365 So. 2d 442 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978) (no debtor/creditor relationship created where construction contract repudiated prior to completion and full payment was received for all work performed to date; action for breach of contract rather than for failure to pay monies owed).
Accordingly, we reverse the trial court’s order and remand this cause with instructions to grant the change of venue.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Mendez v. George Hunt, Inc., 191 So. 2d 480 (Fla. 4th DCA 1966)
- Am. Fid. Fire Ins. Co. v. Allied Gen. Contractors, Inc., 365 So. 2d 442 (Fla. 3d DCA 1978)
- Earl W. Shomber & Co., Inc. v. Fla. Casino Assocs., Inc., 469 So. 2d 936 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985)