ARRIGONI ENTERPRISES, LLC

v.

TOWN OF DURHAM, CONNECTICUT, ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Knick v. Twp. of Scott, 139 S. Ct. 2162 (U.S. 2019)
  …th Amendment does not merely provide a damages remedy to a property owner willing to "shoulder the burden of securing compensation" after the government takes property without paying for it. Arrigoni Enterprises, LLC v. Durham , 578 U.S. ----, ----, 136 S.Ct. 1409, 1409, 194 L.Ed.2d 821 (2016) (THOMAS, J., dissenting from denial of certiorari). Instead, it makes just compensation a "prerequisite" to the government's authority to "tak[e] property for public use." Ibid. A "purported exercise of the eminent-do…

  ← 1 / 2 →

Authorities Cited

• Williamson Cnty. Reg'l Planning Comm'n v. Hamilton Bank of Johnson City, 473 U.S. 172 (U.S. 1985)
• First English Evangelical Lutheran Church of Glendale v. Cnty. of Los Angeles, 482 U.S. 304 (U.S. 1987)
• Lucas v. S.C. Coastal Council, 505 U.S. 1003 (U.S. 1992)
• Cherokee Nation v. S. Kan. Ry. Co., 135 U.S. 641 (U.S. 1890)
• Dolan v. City of Tigard, 512 U.S. 374 (U.S. 1994)
• Suitum v. Tahoe Reg'l Planning Agency, 520 U.S. 725 (U.S. 1997)
• Stop the Beach Renourishment, Inc. v. Fla. Dep't of Env't Prot., 560 U.S. 702 (U.S. 2010)
• SAN Remo Hotel v. City & Cnty. of San Francisco, 545 U.S. 323 (U.S. 2005)
• Horne v. Dep't of Agric., 569 U.S. 513 (U.S. 2013)