THE FLORIDA BAR, COMPLAINANT,
v.
RONALD L. DYKES, RESPONDENT
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The Florida Supreme Court disbarred attorney Ronald L. Dykes following a disciplinary proceeding by The Florida Bar, based on his misconduct during and after a prior six-month suspension, including failure to notify clients of suspension, unauthorized practice, and misappropriation of estate funds.
The Court approved the referee's findings and recommendation, disbarring Dykes effective immediately and prohibiting him from reapplying for admission for ten years. The Court found violations of multiple disciplinary rules including failure to notify clients of suspension, conduct involving dishonesty and misrepresentation, illegal conduct involving moral turpitude, and disregard of a court order.
[1] A lawyer suspended from practice must notify clients of the suspension and provide a list of pending matters to the Bar.
[2] Acting as personal representative for an estate during a suspension from the practice of law, without the service of another attorney, constitutes professional misconduct…
Previewing 2 of 6 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“On June 10, 1985, respondent was suspended from the practice of law for six months. The Florida Bar v. Dykes, 469 So.2d 741 (Fla.1985). By the terms of the suspension, respondent was to be required to prove rehabilitation before being reinstated to active membership in The Florida Bar.”
Establishes Dykes' prior suspension and the condition that he prove rehabilitation before reinstatement
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceDykes was suspended from practice for six months on June 10, 1985, and was required to prove rehabilitation before reinstatement. While suspended, he …
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Illegal Conduct Involving Moral Turpitude cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM
This Florida Bar disciplinary proceeding is before the Court for consideration of the referee’s report finding professional misconduct and recommending that respondent Ronald L. Dykes be disbarred. No petition for review has been filed. We consider the report pursuant to rule 3-7.6 of the Rules Regulating The Florida Bar. On June 10, 1985, respondent was suspended from the practice of law for six months. The Florida Bar v. Dykes, 469 So. 2d 741 (Fla.1985). By the terms of the suspension, respondent was to be required to prove rehabilitation before being reinstated to active membership in The Florida Bar. He has not been reinstated.
The Florida Bar’s complaint contained four counts. On count one, the referee found that respondent had failed to notify a client of his suspension as was required by the former Florida Bar Integration Rule, article XI, rule 11.10(7). He also failed to include the client on the list of pending matters furnished to the Bar upon his suspension. The referee found respondent had violated the foregoing rule and also article XI, rule 11.02(3)(a) (conduct contrary to honesty) and the former Code of Professional Responsibility, Disciplinary Rules 1-102(A)(4) (conduct involving deceit or misrepresentation) and 1-102(A)(6) (conduct adversely reflecting on fitness to practice law).
On count two, the referee found that respondent acted as personal representative for an estate after his suspension and without the service of another attorney as counsel for the estate. He notified neither the client nor the court of his suspension and failed to include the client in the affidavit provided to the Bar upon suspension. The referee found violations of rules 11.-10(7) and 11.02(3)(a) and Disciplinary Rules 1-102(A)(4) and 1-102(A)(6).
On count three, the referee found that after his suspension, respondent had communications with a client regarding the client’s pending legal business. Although the client knew about the suspension, respondent failed to provide the notice contemplated by rule 11.10(7). The referee found that the rule was violated. He also found respondent guilty of violating Disciplinary Rule 1-102(A)(6).
On count four the referee found that respondent misappropriated the funds of an estate with the intent to convert the funds to his own use. The referee found that respondent had also willfully disregarded a court order to turn over the assets of the estate to a succéssor personal representative. The referee concluded that respondent had violated Disciplinary Rules 1-102(A)(3) (illegal conduct involving moral turpitude) and 1-102(A)(4) (conduct involving dishonesty or fraud). These superseded disciplinary rules correspond to Rules of Professional Conduct 4-8.4(b) and 4-8.4(c) of the Rules Regulating The Florida Bar. The referee also found respondent guilty of violating rule 3-4.3 for disregarding a court order. The referee recommended that respondent be disbarred and that he not be permitted to again apply for admission to The Florida Bar for a period of ten years. The respondent does not challenge the referee’s findings and recommendation. We therefore approve the referee’s report. Rule 3-7.6(c)(6), Rules Regulating The Florida Bar. Ronald L. Dykes is hereby disbarred, effective immediately. No application for his admission to The Florida Bar will be considered prior to the expiration of ten years from the date of this judgment.
The costs of this proceeding are taxed against the respondent. Judgment is entered against Ronald L. Dykes in the amount of $2230.70, for which sum let execution issue.
It is so ordered.
McDonald, C.J., and OVERTON, EHRLICH, SHAW, BARKETT, GRIMES and KOGAN, JJ., concur.