ALICIA BRUMANT, PETITIONER,
v.
LORETTA E. LYNCH, ATTORNEY GENERAL.
ALICIA BRUMANT, PETITIONER,
LORETTA E. LYNCH, ATTORNEY GENERAL.
136 S. Ct. 1655
Supreme Court of the United States (2016)
Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 194 L. Ed. 2d 765
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Caver v. Cent. Ala. Elec. Coop., 845 F.3d 1135 (11th Cir. 2017)…the full purposes and objectives of Congress.” Wiersum v. U.S. Bank, N.A., 785 F. 3d 483, 486 (11th Cir. 2015) (quoting English v. Gen. Elec. Co. 496 U.S. 72, 79, 110 S.Ct. 2270, 2275, 110 L.Ed.2d 65 (1990)), cert. denied, — U.S.-, 136 S.Ct. 1655, 194 L.Ed.2d 765 (2016). CAEC has an unusually close and detailed regulatory and contractual relationship with RUS dating back to 1939, and that relationship controls almost all of CAEC’s actions. If Plaintiff Caver is correct that the Alabama statute requires the…