UNITED STATES, ET AL., PETITIONERS

v.

TEXAS, ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• Dep't OF Homeland Sec. v. Regents OF THE Univ. OF Cal., 140 S. Ct. 1891 (U.S. 2020)
  …at 179-181, 186 (internal quotation marks omitted). Judge King dissented. This Court affirmed the Fifth Circuit's judgment by an equally divided vote, which meant that no opinion was issued. United States v. Texas , 579 U.S. ----, 136 S.Ct. 2271, 195 L.Ed.2d 638 (2016) (per curiam ). For the next year, litigation over DAPA and the DACA expansion continued in the Southern District of Texas, while implementation of those policies remained enjoined. Then, in June 2017, following a change in Presidential admi…

  ← 1 / 2 →
• Health Freedom Def. Fund, Inc. v. Biden (M.D. Fla. 2021)
  …o New York state while noting that the court had “no doubts that the law, as it stands today, permits district courts to enter nationwide injunctions”); Texas v. United States, 809 F. 3d 134, 187-88 (5th Cir. 2015), affd by an equally divided court, 136 S. Ct. 2271 (2016) (“It is not beyond the power of a court, in appropriate circumstances, to issue a nationwide injunction.”); California v. Azar, 911 F. 3d 558, 584 (9th Cir. 2018) (stating disapproval of nationwide injunctions and narrowing the relief “to red…