ROBERT L. YEAGER, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
Yeager appeals the summary denial of his post-conviction Rule 3.850 motion alleging ineffective assistance of counsel, illegal sentencing, and coerced guilty plea. The court affirms the denial as to the ineffective assistance claim but reverses and remands the coerced plea allegation because the trial court failed to attach supporting documentation to its order.
The court affirmed the summary denial of the ineffective assistance claim because Yeager failed to allege specific omissions or overt acts. The court reversed and remanded the coerced plea allegation because the trial court's order did not attach any documentary evidence refuting Yeager's allegations, and the plea form itself was unsigned despite the court relying on the existence of a 'written and signed plea' to deny relief.
[1] A motion for post-conviction relief alleging ineffective assistance of counsel is facially insufficient if it fails to allege a specific omission or overt act upon which…
[2] A court may depart from sentencing guidelines when a plea agreement specifies a longer sentence.
Previewing 2 of 5 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence“A defendant making an allegation of ineffective assistance of counsel must first allege a specific omission or overt act upon which his claim is based.”
Establishes the pleading requirement for ineffective assistance claims; Yeager's blanket allegation was insufficient.
Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceYeager was sentenced to 15 years after entering a guilty plea. An unsigned plea form in the record indicates he agreed to the 15-year sentence. Yeager…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Coerced Guilty Plea cases and more on FLexlaw
MILLS, Judge.
Yeager appeals the summary denial of his motion for post-conviction relief pursuant to Rule 3.850, Fla.R.Crim.P., in which he alleged ineffective assistance of counsel, imposition of an illegal sentence exceeding the recommended guidelines range, and coercion of his guilty plea by threats and misinformation. We affirm in part and reverse in part.
A defendant making an allegation of ineffective assistance of counsel must first allege a specific omission or overt act upon which his claim is based. Knight v. State, 394 So. 2d 997,1001 (Fla.1981). If he fails to do so, the motion is facially insufficient. Finney v. State, 502 So. 2d 519 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987). Here, Yeager simply stated that “[c]ounsel was, at every step of the proceeding, ineffective.” The summary denial of the motion as to this allegation was not error. Yeager next alleges that he was illegally sentenced outside the guidelines. However, a court can depart from the guidelines when the plea agreement specifies a longer sentence, Johnson v. State, 458 So. 2d 850 (Fla. 2d DCA 1984). The unsigned plea form appearing in the record in fact indicates that Yeager agreed to the 15-year sentence imposed herein. However, he alleges that the underlying plea of guilty was not voluntary in that it was induced by threats of harsher treatment should he refuse to plead. See Dutton v. State, 504 So. 2d 435 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987) (a plea of guilty is not voluntary if induced by threats of harsher treatment should the defendant insist upon his right to trial).
While denial of a motion which alleges that a plea was coerced is proper where the trial court attaches portions of the record refuting the defendant’s allegations, Sims v. State, 506 So. 2d 1154 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987), in this case it does not appear that the trial court attached anything to its order denying the motion. Even if the plea form included elsewhere in the record is construed to be attached to the order, the trial court specifically relied on the existence of a “written and signed plea” to refute Yeager’s allegations of coercion. The instant plea form, while written, is completely unsigned.
Based on the trial court’s failure to attach any document or other evidence from the record that contradicts Yeager’s claim that his plea was coerced, we reverse as to that allegation and remand for the trial court either to attach the portions of the record and/or file conclusively showing that Yeager is entitled to no relief or to conduct further proceedings pursuant to Rule 3.850.
ERVIN and NIMMONS, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Bland v. State, 25 So. 3d 600 (Fla. 1st DCA 2009)…r did it hold an evidentiary hearing. We reverse and remand the order for the trial court to either attach the relevant portions of the record that conclusively refute the appellant’s claims, or to hold an evidentiary hearing. See Yeager v. State, 514 So. 2d 73 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987) (reversing a claim of an involuntary plea where the court failed to attach any record portions refuting the claim); compare Knowles v. State, 582 So. 2d 167 (Fla. 1st DCA 1991) (affirming where the attached plea agreement and col…
Authorities Cited
- Knight v. State, 394 So. 2d 997 (Fla. 1981)
- City OF Plantation & Mich. Mut. Ins. Co. v. Roberts, 458 So. 2d 850 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984)
- Dutton v. State, 504 So. 2d 435 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987)
- Finney v. State, 502 So. 2d 519 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987)
- Sims v. State, 506 So. 2d 1154 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987)