MARK ANDRES GREEN, ET UX., PETITIONERS,
v.
UNITED STATES.

U.S. | 2016-05-31
No. 15–1313.
136 S. Ct. 2399 Supreme Court of the United States (2016) Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 195 L. Ed. 2d 764
Cited by 1 case
Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Tundidor v. State, 221 So. 3d 587 (Fla. 2017)
    …So. 3d 146, 158 (Fla. 2009). “However, the question of whether a statement is hearsay is a matter of law and is subject to de novo review on appeal.” Cannon v. State, 180 So. 3d 1023, 1037 (Fla. 2015), cert. den [*599] ied, — U.S. —, 136 S.Ct. 2389, 195 L.Ed.2d 764 (2016). If a declarant testifies at trial and is subject to cross-examination concerning the out-of-court statement, then the statement is not hearsay if that statement is “[cjonsistent with the declarant’s testimony and is offered to rebut an expr…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw