ANGEL ANTONIO SEOANE, APPELLANT,
v.
FRANCISCA MILIAN SEOANE, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1987-11-03
No. 87-1695
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and BASKIN and FERGUSON, JJ.
514 So. 2d 430 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1987) Positive Treatment
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

[*431] PER CURIAM.

Agreeing with the trial court that appellant’s prior actions, in and out of court, are inconsistent with his current position that appellee is not entitled to relief, we affirm the Order Declaring that Husband is Es-topped from Denying the Validity of his Dominican Divorce. See Arnold v. Arnold, 500 So. 2d 739 (Fla.3d DCA 1987); Clagett v. King, 308 A. 2d 245 (D.C.App. 1973); Mayer v. Mayer, 66 N.C.App. 522, 311 S.E. 2d 659, review denied, 311 N.C. 760, 321 S.E. 2d 140 (1984).

Affirmed.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Keller v. Keller, 521 So. 2d 273 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988)
    …ng void until a claim was made for alimony and property by the wife in the dissolution proceeding. The trial court’s determination that appellant should be estopped from raising this defense was proper and, thus, affirmed. See also Seoane v. Seoane, 514 So. 2d 430 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987); Arnold v. Arnold, 500 So. 2d 739 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987). We reverse the award of appellant’s interest in the Cocoa restaurant and real property used in connection with it, and the award of the Mercedes to appellee. Appellant claims…
  • Lambertini v. Lambertini, 655 So. 2d 142 (Fla. 3d DCA 1995)
    …reasons the husband was equitably estopped from raising the validity of the marriage, and annulment was improper. See McMichael v. McMichael, 158 Fla. 413, 28 So. 2d 692 (1947); Keller v. Keller, 521 So. 2d 273 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988); Seoane v. Seoane, 514 So. 2d 430 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987); Arnold v. Arnold, 500 So. 2d 739 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987). Each party also claims that the other was the active procurer of the invalid Mexican marriage. However, there is no evidentiary support in the record for the argument that one…
  • Lucilia Lopes v. Luciano Lopes, 852 So. 2d 402 (Fla. 5th DCA 2003)
    …reasons the husband was equitably estopped from raising the validity of the marriage, and annulment was improper. See McMichael v. McMichael, 158 Fla. 413, 28 So. 2d 692 (1947); Keller v. Keller, 521 So. 2d 273 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988); Seoane v. Seoane, 514 So. 2d 430 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987); Arnold v. Arnold, 500 So. 2d 739 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987). Id. at 143. The court made clear that it was not relying on the “fault” of either party in its ruling. It explained that where both parties thought the divorce was valid and n…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw