THE FLORIDA BAR, COMPLAINANT,
v.
CHRISTOS RODIS, RESPONDENT

Fla. | 1987-03-12
No. 69821
McDonald, C.J., and OVERTON, EHRLICH, SHAW, BARKETT, GRIMES and KOGAN, JJ., concur.
514 So. 2d 1069 Florida Supreme Court (1987) Negative Treatment
Cited by 42 cases

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.


Holding

The Court granted the petition for leave to resign permanently from The Florida Bar.


Facts & Procedural History

An attorney sought to resign from The Florida Bar pending disciplinary proceedings, with no leave to apply for reinstatement. Disciplinary proceedings…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

PER CURIAM.

Christos Rodis, an attorney admitted to the practice of law in Florida, has filed a petition for leave to resign from The Florida Bar pending disciplinary proceedings pursuant to article XI, Rule 11.08 of the Florida Bar Integration Rule. The petition states that the requested resignation shall be without leave to apply for reinstatement.

Disciplinary proceedings are pending against the petitioning attorney within the meaning of article XI, Rule 11.08. In The Florida Bar v. Rodis, case No. 69,654, the bar petitioned for the temporary suspension of respondent pursuant to the Integration Rule, article XI, Rule 11.10(6). On December 16, 1986, this Court granted the petition and suspended respondent from the practice of law until further order of the Court.

The petition for leave to resign contains a statement of the pending disciplinary actions against respondent, describing the several complaints and charges being investigated.

The Florida Bar has filed notice that it does not oppose the petition to resign. We find that the public interest will not be adversely affected by the granting of the petition and that allowing resignation at this time will not adversely affect the purity of the courts nor hinder the administration of justice nor the confidence of the public in the legal profession. Fla. Bar Integr. Rule, art. XI, Rule 11.08(3).

We grant the petition of Christos Rodis to resign permanently from The Florida Bar. It is so ordered.

McDonald, C.J., and OVERTON, EHRLICH, SHAW, BARKETT, GRIMES and KOGAN, JJ., concur.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By (21 total)

  • Downs v. State, 740 So. 2d 506 (Fla. 1999)
    …proceeding in accordance with the Supreme Court’s decision in Hitchcock v. Dugger, 481 U.S. 393, 107 S.Ct. 1821, 95 L.Ed.2d 347 (1987) (holding that trial court must consider both statutory and nonstat-utory mitigating factors). See Downs v. Dugger, 514 So. 2d 1069 (Fla.1987). Upon resentencing, the jury again recommended death by a vote of eight to four. The trial court followed the jury’s recommendation, finding three aggravating factors2 and ruling that the mitigating factors did not offset or overcome the…
  • Combs v. State, 525 So. 2d 853 (Fla. 1988)
    …epresents a sufficient change in the law to defeat the argument that Combs should be denied relief on the basis of a procedural default. See White v. Dugger, No. 71,184 (Fla. Jan. 1,1988); Foster v. State, 518 So. 2d 901 (Fla.1987); Downs v. Dugger, 514 So. 2d 1069 (Fla.1987); Thompson v. Dugger, 515 So. 2d 173 (Fla.1987). Consistent with our decision in these cases, we find that Combs’ death sentence was imposed in violation of Lock-ett and Hitchcock, and he is therefore entitled to a new sentencing hearing b…
  • Hall v. State, 541 So. 2d 1125 (Fla. 1989)
    …se in postconviction proceedings. Cooper v. Dugger, 526 So. 2d 900 (Fla.1988); Thompson v. Dugger, 515 So. 2d 173 (Fla.1987), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 108 S.Ct. 1224, 99 L.Ed.2d 424 (1988); McCrae v. State, 510 So. 2d 874 (Fla.1987); Downs v. Dugger, 514 So. 2d 1069 (Fla.1987). Turning to the merits of Hall’s Hitchcock claim, we agree that the trial court limited the jury’s and its own consideration to the statutorily enumerated mitigating circumstances. Hall VI. Furthermore, it is clear from the record that t…

Previewing 3 of 21 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw