LIFE TECHNOLOGIES CORPORATION, ET AL., PETITIONERS,
v.
PROMEGA CORPORATION.

U.S. | 2016-06-27
No. 14–1538
136 S. Ct. 2505 Supreme Court of the United States (2016) Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 195 L. Ed. 2d 838
Cited by 11 cases

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Beckles v. United States, 137 S. Ct. 886 (U.S. 2017)
    …lause is void for vagueness. To resolve a conflict among the Courts of Appeals on the question whether Johnson 's vagueness holding applies to the residual clause in § 4B1.2(a) of the Guidelines, we granted certiorari. 579 U.S. ----, 136 S.Ct. 2510, 195 L.Ed.2d 838 (2016). Because the United States, as respondent, agrees with petitioner that the Guidelines are subject to vagueness challenges, the Court appointed Adam K. Mortara as amicus curiae to argue the contrary position. 579 U.S. ----, 136 S.Ct. 2510, 1…
    1 / 2
  • Cooper v. Harris, 137 S. Ct. 1455 (U.S. 2017)
    …than politics, drove District 12's lines-yet still characterized the majority's view as "[e]minently reasonable." Id., at 640. The State filed a notice of appeal, and we noted probable jurisdiction. McCrory v. Harris, 579 U.S. ----, 136 S.Ct. 2512, 195 L.Ed.2d 838 (2016). II We address at the outset North Carolina's contention that a victory it won in a very similar state-court lawsuit should dictate (or at least influence) our disposition of this case. As the State explains, the North Carolina NAACP and se…
  • In re Hunt, 835 F.3d 1277 (11th Cir. 2016)
    …ny” before Johnson but no longer do. V. When it comes to Matchett, we soon may be told we are wrong again. On the last day of this year’s term, the Supreme Court accepted certiorari in Beckles v. United States, No. 15-8544, — U.S.-, 136 S.Ct. 2510, 195 L.Ed.2d 838, 2016 WL 1029080 (U.S. June 27, 2016). Beckles is yet another Johnson case that originated in this Circuit. This time, the petitioner was sentenced as a career offender under the advisory guidelines rather than under the ACCA. So the Supreme Court…

Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw