FELTON R. BERNARD, PETITIONER,
v.
LOUISIANA.

U.S. | 2016-10-31
No. 16–5857.
137 S. Ct. 387 Supreme Court of the United States (2016) Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 196 L. Ed. 2d 305
Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • United States v. Presendieu, 880 F.3d 1228 (11th Cir. 2018)
    …2 (2014). As this Court has recognized, “[t]his [§ 2B1.6] limitation is particularly relevant to § 2B1.1 because ‘means of identification’ may include access devices.” United States v. Taylor, 818 F. 3d 671, 675 (11th Cir.), cert denied, - U.S. -, 137 S. Ct. 387, 196 L.Ed.2d 305 (2016) (mem.). The § 2B1.6 limitation is intended to prevent a defendant who is separately convicted of aggravated identity theft from being “doubly penalized” for the same conduct. Id. Notwithstanding the § 2B1.6 limitation, a d…
    1 / 2
  • United States v. Keyiona Marvette Wright, 862 F.3d 1265 (11th Cir. 2017)
    …ess device” in § 1029(e)(1) includes credit cards, debit cards, usernames and passwords, routing and bank account numbers, and merchant account numbers. United States v. Taylor, 818 F. 3d 671, 680 (11th Cir.) (credit cards), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 137 S.Ct. 387, 196 L.Ed.2d 305 (2016); United States v. Klopf, 423 F. 3d 1228, 1240 (11th Cir. 2005) (credit cards); United States v. Baldwin, 774 F. 3d 711, 722 (11th Cir. 2014) (debit cards); United States v. Barrington, 648 F. 3d 1178, 1202 (11th Cir. 2011) (u…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw