JOHN HOWELL, PETITIONER,

v.

SANDRA HOWELL.

Citator

Cited By

• Advocate Health Care Network v. Stapleton, 137 S. Ct. 1652 (U.S. 2017)
  …the employees' favor. See Stapleton v. Advocate Health Care Network, 817 F.3d 517, 523 (C.A.7 2016) ; Rollins v. Dignity Health, 830 F.3d 900, 906 (C.A.9 2016). In light of the importance of the issue, this Court granted certiorari. 579 U.S. ----, 137 S.Ct. 546, 547, 196 L.Ed.2d 442 (2016). II The dispute in these cases about what counts as a "church plan" hinges on the combined meaning of paragraph (A) and subparagraph (C)(i). Interpretive purists may refer back as needed to the provisions as quoted a…
• Impression Prods., Inc. v. Lexmark Int'l, Inc., 137 S. Ct. 1523 (U.S. 2017)
  …. Because Lexmark failed to make such an express reservation, its foreign sales exhausted its patent rights. We granted certiorari to consider the Federal Circuit's decisions with respect to both domestic and international exhaustion, 580 U.S. ----, 137 S.Ct. 546, 196 L.Ed.2d 442 (2016), and now reverse. II A First up are the Return Program cartridges that Lexmark sold in the United States. We conclude that Lexmark exhausted its patent rights in these cartridges the moment it sold them. The single-use/no-re…