OBJECTIVE MARKETING ACTION, LTD., A FOREIGN CORPORATION, APPELLANT,

v.

MARSHA R. HILLS, ET AL., APPELLEES

Citator

Cited By

• De Mauro v. State, 632 So. 2d 727 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994)
  …for which are considerably more exacting than those for civil contempt. For an indirect criminal contempt, the requirements of Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.840 must be followed. Pugliese v. Pugliese, 347 So. 2d at 426; Benarroch v. Crawford, 516 So. 2d 28, 29 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987). In the present case the former wife did not appear at the show cause hearing on October 6, 1992. The trial court proceeded in her absence to enter the order of civil contempt. For a criminal contempt, however, the contempt a…
• Kersh v. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co., 686 So. 2d 782 (Fla. 3d DCA 1997)
  …e 3.840); Russ v. State, 622 So. 2d 501 (Fla. 5th DCA 1993) (order finding defendant guilty of indirect criminal contempt reversed because the trial court failed to follow rule 3.840), review denied, 634 So. 2d 626 (Fla.1994); Benarroch v. Crawford, 516 So. 2d 28, 29 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987) (“[T]he petitioner was denied procedural due process in this case because Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.840, which governs indirect criminal contempt, was not followed in any respect by the trial court below.”); Bryant v. State, 363 So. 2d…
• W.C. v. Smith, 898 So. 2d 1137 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005)
  …at conduct constituted the alleged contempt, and a hearing); Pryor v. Wille, 644 So. 2d 346 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994) (quashing an order for indirect criminal contempt when the trial court failed to comply with the procedural rule); Benarroch v. Crawford, 516 So. 2d 28, 29 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987) (holding that the defendant was denied due process because the procedural rule was not followed in any respect by the trial court). Juveniles are entitled to the due process rights afforded to them by rules 8.150(b) and 8.285(…

Authorities Cited

• Szteinbaum v. Kaes Inversiones y Valores, 476 So. 2d 247 (Fla. 3d DCA 1985)
• Quinn v. The Hous. Auth. OF the City OF Orlando, 385 So. 2d 1167 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980)