R.C., A JUVENILE, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Fla. 3d DCA | 1987-12-08
No. 85-1300
Before SCHWARTZ, C.J., and BASKIN and DANIEL S. PEARSON, JJ.
516 So. 2d 98 Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1987)

Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.

[*99] PER CURIAM.

Appellant R.C. challenges the court’s order adjudicating him delinquent based upon the finding that he committed the crime of attempted sexual battery. First, he contends that the court erred in excluding relevant eyewitness testimony. Second, he argues that the state failed to present substantial, competent evidence to support the adjudication. Finding no merit in the points raised, we affirm. See Caulder v. State, 500 So. 2d 1362 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986), review denied, 511 So. 2d 297 (Fla.1987); R.A.S. v. State, 458 So. 2d 343 (Fla. 1st DCA 1984); I.R. v. State, 385 So. 2d 686 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980); D.S.H. v. State, 323 So. 2d 292 (Fla. 3d DCA 1975).

Affirmed.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw