SANDOZ INC., PETITIONER,

v.

AMGEN INC., ET AL.

Citator

Cited By

• McWilliams v. Comm'r, Ala. Dep't of Corr., 940 F.3d 1218 (11th Cir. 2019)
  …been “afforded an expert who actually reviewed his full psychiatric history and had more than a few hours to assist the defense.” Id. Mr. McWilliams appealed the denial of his Ake claim. The Supreme Court granted certiorari, see McWilliams v. Dunn, 137 S. Ct. 808 (2017) (mem.), and then reversed. See McWilliams, 137 S. Ct. at 1801. The Supreme Court determined that it did not need to answer whether “Ake clearly established that a State must provide an indigent defendant with a qualified mental health expert…
• North Carolina v. Covington, 137 S. Ct. 1624 (U.S. 2017)
  …ontinue to be represented by legislators elected pursuant to a racial gerrymander." App. to Juris. Statement 200. North Carolina appealed the District Court's remedial order to this Court, and we granted a stay pending appeal. See 580 U.S. ----, 137 S.Ct. 808, 196 L.Ed.2d 594 (2017). The State now contends that "the remedial order should be vacated for the simple reason that the district court failed to meaningfully weigh any equitable considerations." Juris. Statement 22. We share that assessment an…
• Sandoz Inc. v. Amgen Inc., 137 S. Ct. 1664 (U.S. 2017)
  …until 180 days after the date it provided its second notice. Id., at 1360-1361. We granted Sandoz's petition for certiorari, No. 15-1039, and Amgen's conditional cross-petition for certiorari, No. 15-1195, and consolidated the cases. 580 U.S. ----, 137 S.Ct. 808, 196 L.Ed.2d 594 (2017). III The first question we must answer is whether § 262(l )(2)(A)'s requirement that an applicant provide the sponsor with its application and manufacturing information is enforceable by an injunction under either federal o…