ANTONIO MUINA, M.D., APPELLANT,
v.
MITTIE AND FRANK HOOD, APPELLEES
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that the appellant's affidavit of disqualification was legally insufficient, and thus the motion for relief from judgment was properly denied.
[1] An affidavit of disqualification must be legally sufficient and contain a factual basis to show a well-founded fear of prejudice.
[2] Past rulings against a party by a judge do not constitute a basis for disqualification on the ground of prejudice.
Previewing 2 of 4 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAppellant sought relief from a final judgment, alleging the judge was prejudiced. He submitted an affidavit of disqualification based on the judge's a…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Prejudice Of Judge cases and more on FLexlaw
WENTWORTH, Judge.
Appellant seeks review of an order by which his motion for relief from judgment was denied. He argues that the order was entered by a disqualified judge, and that he has not been afforded a fair review of his case by the appellate courts. We find that appellant’s affidavit of disqualification, upon which he based his motion for relief from judgment, is legally insufficient. We find that appellant has been afforded a fair review of his case in his numerous appeals to this court. We therefore affirm.
Appellant’s motion for relief from judgment, submitted in error pursuant to Florida Rule of Civil Procedure 1.540, alleged that a February 2, 1981, final judgment entered against him in a medical malpractice case was a nullity because the judge was prejudiced against him. In support of that allegation, appellant submitted an affidavit of disqualification, stating that the judge had exhibited prejudice against him in a separate case by refusing to grant him a hearing for stay of execution and by failing to send him a copy of the judgment, and that the judge was prejudiced against him because of his nationality and beliefs. These asserted grounds for disqualification are insufficient to show a well-founded fear of prejudice. See Mt. Sinai Medical Center v. Brown, 493 So. 2d 512 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986). A motion to disqualify a judge must have a factual basis. Wyman v. Reasbeck, 436 So. 2d 1112 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983). We find no factual basis to the allegations of prejudice here. Past rulings against a party by a judge may not be a basis for disqualification on the ground of prejudice. Gieseke v. Grossman, 418 So. 2d 1055 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982). We therefore find that the trial court properly denied the motion for relief from judgment.
Appellant has appealed his case to this court and to the Florida Supreme Court approximately nine times. We find that no appeal was improperly dismissed by this court, and that appellant has been afforded ample review of his case in this court in accordance with principles of fairness and justice.
The order is affirmed.
JOANOS and WIGGINTON, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Authorities Cited
- Terry v. State, 418 So. 2d 1055 (Fla. 5th DCA 1982)
- Wyman v. The Honorable James M. Reasbeck, 436 So. 2d 1112 (Fla. 4th DCA 1983)
- MT. Sinai Med. Ctr. & Gates v. Earnestine Brown and Division of Workers' Compensation, 493 So. 2d 512 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986)