GENE FLINN, APPELLANT,
v.
KAREN SHIELDS AND VIRGINIA CATHCART, APPELLEES
PER CURIAM.
Plaintiff appeals a summary judgment entered in favor of the defendants in an action charging fraud and conspiracy. The record on appeal discloses that there are genuine issues of material fact which have not been eliminated by the movants for summary judgment. See Nessim v. DeLoache, 384 So. 2d 1341 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980).
Reversed and remanded for further proceedings.
HENDRY and FERGUSON, JJ., concur.
SCHWARTZ, Chief Judge
(dissenting).
Assuming the very doubtful proposition that the plaintiff had stated any cognizable claim for relief, I think it clear that its factual non-existence was established beyond genuine issue and as a matter of law. I would affirm.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Md. Maint. Serv., Inc. v. Vittorio Palmieri and Bertha Palmieri, 559 So. 2d 74 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990)…”) (citations omitted).4 Absent the existence of a duty owed to plaintiff, Maryland Maintenance was entitled to a directed verdict as a matter of law. See Westchester Exxon v. Valdes, 524 So. 2d 452, 455 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988); Seitz v. Surfside, Inc., 517 So. 2d 49 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987), review denied, 525 So. 2d 880 (Fla.1988); see also Florida Power & Light Co. v. Lively, 465 So. 2d 1270, 1273 (Fla. 3d DCA) (en banc), review denied, 476 So. 2d 674 (Fla.1985) (existence of duty is question of law for the court).…
-
Mordechai Adika v. Beekman Towers, Inc., 633 So. 2d 1170 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994)…red while he is away from the premises.” Restatement (Second) of Torts § 314A cmt. c (1965). Likewise, an innkeeper in Florida has no duty to warn its guests of naturally occurring surf conditions off of a public beach. See Seitz v. Surfside, Inc., 517 So. 2d 49 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987), rev. denied, 525 So. 2d 880 (Fla.1988). Even if Beekman Towers did have such a duty, it was satisfied by the pool attendant’s warning to Adika that he should not swim alone in the rough surf. In support of his argument that the…
-
Brien v. Fla. Dep't of Transp., 538 So. 2d 526 (Fla. 4th DCA 1989)…spasser is that the property owner is under the duty only to avoid willful and wanton harm to him and upon discovery of his presence to warn him of known dangers not open to ordinary observation. 284 So. 2d at 693. See also Seitz v. Surfside, Inc., 517 So. 2d 49 (Fla. 3d DCA 1987). Although Brien and his friend had driven the exact route at least ten times previously, and the end of the pavement certainly [*528] was open to ordinary observation to them, that possible question of fact need not be reached, s…
Previewing 3 of 7 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Salomon Kassin Nessim v. Mickey DeLOACHE, 384 So. 2d 1341 (Fla. 3d DCA 1980)