WILLIAM COX, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
WILLIAM COX, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
517 So. 2d 87
Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1987)
Caution
Cited by 14 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
Appellant raises two issues in this appeal. We find that the first issue is without merit and decline to address it. In the second issue, appellant points out that although he pled nolo contendere to battery and the trial court accepted the plea and adjudicated him guilty of battery, the written judgment incorrectly finds appellant guilty of aggravated battery. The state in its answer brief acknowledges the error, We therefore remand the case to the trial court to correct the written judgment,
AFFIRMED in part and REMANDED instructions,
ERVIN, JOANOS and BARFIELD, jj concur<
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Barnishin v. State, 927 So. 2d 68 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006)…e served while Jones awaited sentencing for .revocation of probation because the sentence imposed on that count was made consecutive to the sentence imposed on count 1.”); see also Daniels, 491 So. 2d at 545; Bell, 573 So. 2d at 11; Knight v. State, 517 So. 2d 87, 88 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987) (“Appellant is not entitled to credit on each of his consecutive sentences.... ”). But Mr. Barnishin should have received credit for seventy-four days on each sentence, because he was sentenced to and had served seventy-four…
-
Jones v. State, 633 So. 2d 482 (Fla. 1st DCA 1994)…on a sentence of imprisonment, and argues that the same rules govern credit for such jail time and prison time, with any difference in the rules depending on whether the subsequent offenses are concurrent or consecutive. See, e.g., Knight v. State, 517 So. 2d 87 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987); Bell v. State, 573 So. 2d 10 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990); Hipp v. State, 509 So. 2d 1208 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987); Keene v. State, 500 So. 2d 592 (Fla. 2d DCA 1986). Contrary to the state’s contention, credit for time served in prison on a…1 / 2
-
Harden v. State, 528 So. 2d 544 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988)…ses is to reverse and remand with directions to comply with the requirements of Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. See Green v. State, 525 So. 2d 1037 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988); Russell v. State, 521 So. 2d 379 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988); Knight v. State, 517 So. 2d 87 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987); House v. State, 511 So. 2d 724 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987); Hall v. State, 511 So. 2d 676 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987). Accordingly, we reverse and remand this matter to the trial court. Upon remand, the trial court is directed to support the…
Previewing 3 of 7 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence