JOHN CARGUILLO, AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF JOHN JOSEPH CARGUILLO, DECEASED, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, APPELLEE
JOHN CARGUILLO, AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF JOHN JOSEPH CARGUILLO, DECEASED, APPELLANT,
STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, APPELLEE
517 So. 2d 138
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1988)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
On the authority of State Farm Fire and Casualty Co. v. Becraft, 501 So. 2d 1316 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986), we affirm the entry of final summary judgment in favor of the appellee, State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company. Furthermore, we certify to the Florida Supreme Court the following question to be of great public importance:
WHETHER A VEHICLE DESIGNED PRIMARILY FOR OFF-ROAD USE CAN BE EXCLUDED FROM UNINSURED MOTORIST COVERAGE BECAUSE IT IS NOT A “MOTOR VEHICLE” WITHIN THE DEFINITION OF THE FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY LAW OR WHETHER SUCH AN EXCLUSION IS VOID FOR PUBLIC POLICY REASONS?
AFFIRMED.
DOWNEY, WALDEN and GUNTHER, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Carguillo v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 529 So. 2d 276 (Fla. 1988)…M UNINSURED MOTORIST COVERAGE BECAUSE IT IS NOT A “MOTOR VEHICLE” WITHIN THE DEFINITION OF THE FINANCIAL RESPONSIBILITY LAW OR WHETHER SUCH AN EXCLUSION IS VOID FOR PUBLIC POLICY REASONS? Carguillo v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, 517 So. 2d 138 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988).1 In Becraft, the district court was presented with the question of “whether an uninsured motorist carrier can exclude coverage for a motor vehicle designed mainly for use off the public roads when the vehicle is being operated…
Authorities Cited
- State Farm Fire & Cas. Co. & State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. Becraft, 501 So. 2d 1316 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986)