MURRAY GALIN, APPELLANT,
v.
ROYAL SAMPLE SERVICE CORPORATION, ET AL., APPELLEES
PER CURIAM.
The summary judgment in favor of appellee Harry Eichler is reversed on authority of Nu-Way Plumbing, Inc. v. Superior Mechanical, Inc., 315 So. 2d 556 (Fla. 2d DCA 1975).
Appellees correctly point out that paragraph seven of the second amended complaint, wherein appellant seeks to recover salary and insurance coverage benefits, incorrectly alleges that such benefits flow from the agreement between Martin Pasti-na and appellee Eichler rather than from the stock purchase agreement. The summary judgment in favor of appellee Royal Sample Service Corporation is therefore affirmed. Upon motion, appellant should be permitted to amend his complaint.
REVERSED IN PART; AFFIRMED IN PART, AND REMANDED.
DOWNEY and LETTS, JJ., and LINDSEY, HUBERT R., Associate Judge, concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Dwyn Daniels Robbie v. Robbie, 591 So. 2d 1006 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991)…preme court held that a trial court must set forth specific findings regarding the “lodestar figure,” i.e., number of hours reasonably expended multiplied by a reasonable hourly rate, when it makes an award of attorneys’ fees. In Pollack v. Pollack, 517 So. 2d 707 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987), rev. denied, 528 So. 2d 1183 (Fla.1988), and Hoopes v. Hoopes, 525 So. 2d 1015 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988), we held that the Rowe lodestar requirements applied to dissolution of marriage proceedings and allowances of suit money under se…
-
Belmont v. Belmont, 761 So. 2d 406 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000)…roperty, requires the trial court to “set apart to each spouse that spouse’s nonmar-ital assets and liabilities....” Nonmarital assets may not be conveyed, absent agreement, to the non-owning spouse in equitable distribution. See Pollack v. Pollack, 517 So. 2d 707 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987). Although this issue was first raised at oral argument, we are not precluded from addressing it because it is the equivalent of fundamental error. Accordingly, we reverse the award to the wife of the Manaso-ta Key home. The undis…
-
Kelly v. Kelly, 557 So. 2d 625 (Fla. 4th DCA 1990)…s does not set forth specific findings as to the hourly rate, number of hours reasonably expended and the appropriateness of the application of reduction or enhancement factors. Lanham v. Lanham, 528 So. 2d 80 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988); Pollack v. Pollack, 517 So. 2d 707 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987). Accordingly, the judgment appealed from is affirmed in all respects except as to the allowance of attorney’s fees and remanded for further proceedings consistent herewith. DOWNEY and WALDEN, JJ., and McNULTY, JOSEPH P., Associ…
Previewing 3 of 8 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Hickman v. State, 315 So. 2d 556 (Fla. 2d DCA 1975)