RICHARD M. VILLARREAL, PETITIONER,
v.
R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO CO., ET AL.

U.S. | 2017-06-26
No. 16–971.
137 S. Ct. 2292 Supreme Court of the United States (2017) Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 198 L. Ed. 2d 724
Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • …statute. If the text of the statute is unambiguous, we need look no further." (citation omitted) ); see also Villarreal v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co. , 839 F. 3d 958, 969-70 (11th Cir. 2016) (en banc), cert. denied , --- U.S. ----, 137 S.Ct. 2292, 198 L.Ed.2d 724 (2017). Here, the plain language of § 547(c)(4) unambiguously excludes paid new value as a defense to a creditor's preference liability only when that new value is paid for with an "otherwise unavoidable transfer." 11 U.S.C. § 547(c)(4)(B). We the…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw