CHARLES MURPHY, PETITIONER,
v.
ROBERT SMITH, ET AL.

U.S. | 2017-08-25
No. 16–1067.
138 S. Ct. 42 Supreme Court of the United States (2017) Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 198 L. Ed. 2d 770
Cited by 4 cases
Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Murphy v. Smith, 138 S. Ct. 784 (U.S. 2018)
    …here we have both sides of the debate, and our question, in a nutshell: did the district court have latitude to apply 10% (or some other discretionary amount) of the plaintiff's judgment to his attorney's fee award instead of 25%? See 582 U.S. ----, 138 S.Ct. 42, 198 L.Ed.2d 770 (2017) (granting certiorari to resolve this question). As always, we start with the specific statutory language in dispute. That language (again) says "a portion of the judgment (not to exceed 25 percent) shall be applied to satis…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw