DONALD J. TRUMP, PRESIDENT OF THE UNITED STATES, ET AL., PETITIONERS,
v.
HAWAII, ET AL.

U.S. | 2017-08-24
No. 16–1540.
138 S. Ct. 42 Supreme Court of the United States (2017) Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 198 L. Ed. 2d 769
Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Hannon v. State, 228 So. 3d 505 (Fla. 2017)
    …), cert. denied, Nos. 17-6222, 17A375, — U.S. —, 138 S.Ct. 312, 199 L.Ed.2d 202, 2017 WL 4409398 (U.S. Oct. 5, 2017); Hitchcock, 226 So. 3d 216; Asay v. State (Asay V), 210 So. 3d 1, 22 (Fla. 2016), cert. denied, No. 16-9033, — U.S. —, 138 S.Ct. 41, 198 L.Ed.2d 769, 2017 WL 1807588 (U.S. Aug. 24, 2017). Hannon contends that he raises novel chapter 2017-1, Laws of Florida, and Eighth Amendment challenges and that we have not addressed those issues; yet, Hannon is mistaken because we have expressly rejected th…
    1 / 4
  • …preme Court held that, under state law, Hurst did not apply retroactively to capital convictions where the death sentence became final prior to the issuance of Ring. Asay v. State, 210 So. 3d 1, 22 (Fla. 2016), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 138 S.Ct. 41, 198 L.Ed.2d 769, 2017 WL 1807588 (2017) (“Asay V”). This Court has noted that Hurst, like Ring, is not retroactively applicable to eases on collateral review under federal law. Lambrix V, 851 F. 3d at 1165 n.2. In response to Hurst, the Florida legislature passe…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw