KIRTISH PATEL, PETITIONER,
v.
UNITED STATES.

U.S. | 2017-10-02
No. 16–1301.
138 S. Ct. 74 Supreme Court of the United States (2017) Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 199 L. Ed. 2d 23
Cited by 1 case
Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Hammett v. Paulding Cnty., 875 F.3d 1036 (11th Cir. 2017)
    …alified immunity. H. STANDARD OF REVIEW We review the district court’s grant of qualified immunity to Horsley, Whitener, and Mayfield de novo. Dukes v. Deaton, 852 F. 3d 1035, 1041 (11th Cir. 2017), petition for cert. filed, — U.S. —, 138 S.Ct. 72, 199 L.Ed.2d 23. III. DISCUSSION A. Qualified Immunity Generally The Supreme Court has long held that government officials are entitled to a form' of immunity from civil suits for damages. See Nixon v. Fitzgerald, 457 U.S. 731, 744, 102 S.Ct. 2690, 2698, 73 L.Ed.…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw