A.M. MANUFACTURING, INC., A FOREIGN CORPORATION, APPELLANT,
v.
MAXINE BARATZ, AS PARENT AND NATURAL GUARDIAN OF DAVID BARATZ, A MINOR, APPELLEE
A.M. MANUFACTURING, INC., A FOREIGN CORPORATION, APPELLANT,
MAXINE BARATZ, AS PARENT AND NATURAL GUARDIAN OF DAVID BARATZ, A MINOR, APPELLEE
518 So. 2d 421
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1988)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
[*422] PER CURIAM.
AFFIRMED.
LETTS and WALDEN, JJ., concur. STONE, J., dissents in part with opinion.
Dissent
STONE, Judge,
dissenting in part.
I dissent as to the use of a multiplier in the computation of appellee’s attorney’s fees. In all other respects, I concur in affirming.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Oriental Imports, Inc. v. Rosario Alilin and E. Roger Alilin, M.D., 559 So. 2d 442 (Fla. 5th DCA 1990)…ckett Ltd., 543 So. 2d 883 (Fla. 5th DCA 1989). This rule is also followed by other courts. Dragstrem v. Butts, 370 So. 2d 416 (Fla. 1st DCA 1979); Warren Hunnicutt, Jr., Inc. v. Gleason, 462 So. 2d 878 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985); A.M. Mfg., Inc. v. Baratz, 518 So. 2d 421 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988). But see Puder v. Revitz, 424 So. 2d 76 (Fla. 4th DCA 1982), and del Real, M.D. v. Dawson, 320 So. 2d 20 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975). The determination of the amount and type of costs that are appropriate for the action in which they we…