MANOJ KUMAR JHA, PETITIONER,
v.
UNITED STATES.

U.S. | 2017-10-02
No. 17–5104.
138 S. Ct. 210 Supreme Court of the United States (2017) Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 199 L. Ed. 2d 138
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus

Citator

Cited By

  • Guillen v. U.S. Attorney General, 910 F.3d 1174 (11th Cir. 2018)
    …uments for the petitioner's convictions identified a specific controlled substance, as they do here. Id. at 68. The First Circuit's conclusion is no outlier. In United States v. Henderson, 841 F. 3d 623 (3d Cir. 2016), cert. denied, --- U.S. ----, 138 S.Ct. 210, 199 L.Ed.2d 138 (2017), the Third Circuit held that a Pennsylvania controlled substance statute was divisible. Id. at 626. The court adhered to the Superior Court of Pennsylvania's holding that the particular substance was an element of the offen…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw