ROTHE DEVELOPMENT, INC., PETITIONER,
v.
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, ET AL.
ROTHE DEVELOPMENT, INC., PETITIONER,
DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE, ET AL.
138 S. Ct. 354
Supreme Court of the United States (2017)
Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 199 L. Ed. 2d 261
Cited by 5 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Currier v. Virginia., 138 S. Ct. 2144 (U.S. 2018)
-
United States v. Microsoft Corp., 138 S. Ct. 1186 (U.S. 2018)…nment has obtained a warrant under 18 U.S.C. § 2703, a U.S. provider of e-mail services must disclose to the Government electronic communications within its control even if the provider stores the communications abroad. 583 U.S. ----, 138 S.Ct. 356, 199 L.Ed.2d 261 (2017). In December 2013, federal law enforcement agents applied to the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York for a § 2703 warrant requiring Microsoft to disclose all e-mails and other information associated with the ac…
-
Ohio v. Am. Express Co., 138 S. Ct. 2274 (U.S. 2018)…., at 196-200. Evaluating the credit-card market as a whole, the Second Circuit concluded that Amex's antisteering provisions were not anticompetitive and did not violate § 1. See id., at 200-206. We granted certiorari, 583 U.S. ----, 138 S.Ct. 355, 199 L.Ed.2d 261 (2017), and now affirm. II Section 1 of the Sherman Act prohibits "[e]very contract, combination in the form of trust or otherwise, or conspiracy, in restraint of trade or commerce among the several States." 15 U.S.C. § 1. This Court has long recogn…