KARRIECE QUONTREL DAVIS, PETITIONER,
v.
UNITED STATES.
KARRIECE QUONTREL DAVIS, PETITIONER,
UNITED STATES.
138 S. Ct. 566
Supreme Court of the United States (2017)
Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 199 L. Ed. 2d 444
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
In re BFW Liquidation, LLC v. Blue Bell Creameries, Inc., 899 F.3d 1178 (11th Cir. 2018)…, 1244 (11th Cir. 2017) ("[D]icta is defined as those portions of an opinion that are not necessary to deciding the case then before us." (quoting United States v. Kaley , 579 F. 3d 1246, 1253 n.10 (11th Cir. 2009) ) ), cert. denied , --- U.S. ----, 138 S.Ct. 566, 199 L.Ed.2d 445 (2017). "[D]icta is not binding on anyone for any purpose." Edwards , 602 F. 3d at 1298. Accordingly, if the statement in Jet Florida System indicating that new value must remain unpaid is dictum, then we are "free to give ... fre…