MARK GROPPER, AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF LINDA GROPPER, DECEASED, APPELLANT,
v.
MT. SINAI MEDICAL CENTER, FOUNDATION, INC., A FLORIDA CORPORATION, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court held that the hospital did not breach its duty to the deceased patient and there was no causal connection between the hospital's conduct and the patient's death.
The appellant alleged a hospital breached its duty by failing to immediately communicate blood test results showing a serious infection to the decease…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Substantial Factor Test cases and more on FLexlaw
FERGUSON, Judge.
Appellant alleges the existence of a genuine issue of fact as to whether the appel-lee-hospital breached a duty to the deceased, Linda Gropper, by failing to communicate immediately to her physician the results of a blood test which showed a serious bacterial infection. Four days after the blood test, Mrs. Gropper was returned to the hospital comatose. She died several hours later as a result of the infection.
A hospital pathologist gave an uncontra-dicted opinion that there was nothing critical in the blood test which, in accordance with the hospital’s internal policy, would require a telephone call to the patient’s physician. The facts show further that the same blood-test information was available to the deceased’s physician as early as sev eral hours after the blood test was conducted and was in fact reviewed by her physician the following morning. He saw no reason for medical alarm.
The trial court determined that the evidence showed conclusively, (1) no breach by the hospital of a duty owed to the deceased and, (2) no causal connection between the hospital’s conduct and Mrs. Gropper’s death. We agree.
Whether a defendant’s conduct was a substantial factor in injury to a plaintiff is properly decided as a matter of law where reasonable persons could not differ. Banat v. Armando, 430 So. 2d 503 (Fla. 3d DCA 1983), rev. denied, 446 So. 2d 99 (Fla. 1984).
Summary judgment is affirmed.