DIXIE INSURANCE COMPANY, APPELLANT,

v.

RACHEL RAE COLEMAN, BY AND THROUGH HER MOTHER AND NATURAL GUARDIAN, DEBORAH MARIE DONKEL, AND DEBORAH MARIE DONKEL, INDIVIDUALLY, APPELLEES

Citator

Cited By

• Metro. Dade Cnty. & Metro. Dade Cnty. Self-Insurance v. Rolle, 661 So. 2d 124 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995)
  …ation for a rule nisi is required to determine only whether the order is “still viable and, if so, [to] require compliance by the carrier until such time as the order is modified or terminated by the commissioner.” Pierce v. Aetna Insurance Company, 519 So. 2d 754, 756 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988). Even when the circuit court feels that the order “is unclear,” the court is not authorized to deny enforcement and direct that the matter be returned to the judge of compensation claims for entry of a clearer order because:…
• Emro Mktg. & Frank Gates Serv. Co. v. Schwier, 670 So. 2d 1141 (Fla. 1st DCA 1996)
  …n a rule nisi proceeding. Benedict v. Executive Risk Consultants, Inc., 616 So. 2d 525, 526 (Fla. 4th DCA 1993). Case law indicates that an award of TTD benefits until a claimant reaches MMI will be enforced by a rule nisi. Pierce v. Aetna Ins. Co., 519 So. 2d 754 (Fla. 4th DCA 1988); Phoenix Assurance Co. of N.Y. v. Merritt, 160 So. 2d 552 (Fla. 2d DCA 1963), cert. denied, 168 So. 2d 147 (Fla.1964). We must therefore conclude that because appellee requested TTD benefits continuing after the date of the fina…
• Knapp v. Florida Mining AND Materials, 662 So. 2d 983 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995)
  …n 440.28, Florida Statutes. City of Miami v. [*985] Knight, 510 So. 2d 1069, 1072 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987), review denied, 518 So. 2d 1276 (Fla.1987), rev’d on other grounds, Barragan v. City of Miami, 545 So. 2d 252 (Fla.1989); Pierce v. Aetna Ins. Co., 519 So. 2d 754 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988). Modification is not required where prior orders do not adjudicate the issue on the merits. Here, however, the JCC did adjudicate an entitlement to the PTD supplement, and such adjudication could not have been made without an und…