MATT LANGLEY BELL, III, AS TAX COLLECTOR OF ESCAMBIA COUNTY, FLORIDA AND JOHN R. JONES, AS PROPERTY APPRAISER OF ESCAMBIA COUNTY, FLORIDA, APPELLANTS,
v.
DON BRYAN, RUEPERT D. BRYAN, AND NELLIE B. BRYAN, W.O. WEDEL, DOROTHY H. THAYER AND MERRELL FAIRCHILD, APPELLEES

Fla. 1st DCA | 1988-01-05
No. BR-449
ZEHMER, J„ and PEARSON, TILLMAN (Ret.), Associate Judge, concur.
519 So. 2d 1024 Florida District Court of Appeal, First District (1988) Caution
Cited by 4 cases

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Synopsis

The Florida District Court of Appeal affirmed the trial court's dismissal of a tax collection action brought by the Tax Collector and Property Appraiser of Escambia County against taxpayers. The court held that assessments against the taxpayers' leasehold interests were void because leaseholds are intangibles under Florida law and cannot be assessed as real property, and that void tax assessments may be challenged at any time regardless of statutory limitations periods.


Holding

The court affirmed the trial court's dismissal on both grounds. First, assessments against leasehold interests are invalid because leaseholds are intangibles, not real property. Second, void tax assessments may be enjoined and challenged at any time, regardless of the statutory 60-day limitations period applicable to taxpayers initiating assessment contests.


Headnotes

[1] Leasehold interests in property are classified as intangible assets under Florida law.

[2] A statute of limitations does not bar an action to enjoin tax assessments that are void.

Previewing 2 of 4 headnotes on this case. FLexlaw’s editorially structured points of law — every proposition, pinpointed — are reserved for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Key Quotes

“the Florida Supreme Court has stated that when tax assessments are void, they may be enjoined at any time”

Establishes that void assessments are not subject to statutory limitations periods, unlike merely erroneous assessments

Previewing 1 of 3 key quotes on this case — the court’s exact language, pinpointed for members.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Facts & Procedural History

The Tax Collector and Property Appraiser of Escambia County sought to collect taxes against appellees (taxpayers) for assessments made on their leaseh…

The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.


Opinion of the Court
SHIVERS, Judge.

SHIVERS, Judge.

Appellant, Matt Langley Bell, III, appeals from the trial court’s final judgment of dismissal granting a motion to dismiss filed by the appellees/taxpayers. Bell raises the following issues in this appeal: (1) whether the trial court erred in concluding that the assessments made against the appellees were against their leasehold interests, which by Florida law are defined as intangibles, and (2) whether the trial court erred in granting appellees’ motion to dismiss in view of Bell’s allegations that the statute of limitations barred such a challenge. We affirm.

We affirm as to Issue I based on our holding in Bell v. Bryan, 505 So. 2d 690 (Fla. 1st DCA), review denied, 513 So. 2d 1060 (Fla.1987). As to Issue II, we note that section 194.171(2), Florida Statutes (1983),1 applies on its face to instances where the taxpayer is in the posture of a plaintiff bringing an action contesting a tax assessment, and that in the instant case, the taxpayers are the defendants. Moreover, the Florida Supreme Court has stated that when tax assessments are void, they may be enjoined at any time. Lake Worth Towers, Inc. v. Gerstung, 262 So. 2d 1 (Fla.1972); see also Neptune Hollywood Beach Club, Inc. v. Markham, 473 So. 2d 691 (Fla. 4th DCA 1985). In the instant case, the appellees argued in their motion to dismiss that the property appraiser had no authority to assess their interest in leasehold improvements as real property. Consequently, appellees were alleging that the taxes the tax collector sought to collect were void. See Lake Worth Towers, Inc. v. Gerstung, 262 So. 2d at 4. For the foregoing reasons, we affirm.

ZEHMER, J„ and PEARSON, TILLMAN (Ret.), Associate Judge, concur. . The statute provides:

No action shall be brought to contest a tax assessment after 60 days from the date the assessment being contested is certified for collection under s. 193.122(2), or after 60 days from the date a decision is rendered concerning such assessment by the property appraisal adjustment board if a petition contesting the assessment had not received final action by the property appraisal adjustment board prior to extension of the roll under s. 197.0134.

Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • 1108 Ariola, LLC v. Jones, 71 So. 3d 892 (Fla. 1st DCA 2011)
    …p, 293 So. 2d 689 (Fla.1974); Williams v. Jones, 326 So. 2d 425 (Fla.1975); Archer v. Marshall, 355 So. 2d 781 (Fla.1978); Am Fi Investment Corp. v. Kinney, 360 So. 2d 415 (Fla.1978); Ward v. Brown, 919 So. 2d 462 (Fla. 1st DCA 2005); Bell v. Bryan, 519 So. 2d 1024 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988) (Bell II); and Bell v. Bryan, 505 So. 2d 690 (Fla. 1st DCA 1987) (Bell I). Most recently, this court affirmed the judgment of the Santa Rosa County Circuit Court which ruled that the leaseholders of various properties located on…
  • Marathon AIR Servs., Inc. v. Ervin A. Higgs, 575 So. 2d 1340 (Fla. 3d DCA 1991)
    …t from ad valorem taxation under section 196.199(2)(a). See Parker v. Hertz Corp., 544 So. 2d 249 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989). Marathon Air relies on Bell v. Bryan, 505 So. 2d 690 (Fla. 1st DCA), review denied, 513 So. 2d 1060 (Fla.1987), aff'd after remand, 519 So. 2d 1024 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988) (judgment of dismissal in favor of lessee), but in that case the lease provided that title to any building erected on the demised premises by lessee would immediately vest in the County. For that reason, the Bell court held that…

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw