WILLIAM SEACREST, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
WILLIAM SEACREST, APPELLANT,
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
519 So. 2d 1035
Florida District Court of Appeal, Fourth District (1988)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 1 case
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
We affirm appellant’s conviction of carrying a concealed weapon and the sentence imposed by the trial court. However, the guidelines scoresheet erroneously lists aggravated assault as the primary conviction and carrying a concealed weapon as an additional offense. Therefore, we remand this case to the trial court with instructions to correct the scoresheet in accordance with conviction for carrying a concealed weapon.
HERSEY, C.J., and ANS.TEAD and DELL, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Buffalo Tank Corp. v. Env't Control Equip., Inc., 544 So. 2d 1037 (Fla. 2d DCA 1989)…this court. This court cannot grant Buffalo Tank any effectual relief since there no longer is a fund upon which an equitable lien could be impressed. Thus, the issue on appeal is moot. See Duval Fed. Sav. and Loan Ass’n v. Hallmark Builders, Inc., 519 So. 2d 1035 (Fla. 5th DCA 1988); Montgomery v. Dep’t of Health and Rehabilitative Services, 468 So. 2d 1014 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985). Even if the case were not moot, Buffalo Tank failed to allege the absence of an adequate remedy at law against ECE. In order to ple…