ABEL DANIEL HIDALGO
v.
ARIZONA.
ABEL DANIEL HIDALGO
ARIZONA.
138 S. Ct. 1054
Supreme Court of the United States (2018)
Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 200 L. Ed. 2d 496
Cited by 3 cases
Opinion of the Court
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Jordan v. Mississippi. Timothy Nelson Evans, 138 S. Ct. 2567 (U.S. 2018)…ch allows for imposition of the death penalty for "felony murder based on 22 possible predicate felony offenses ... including, for example, transporting marijuana for sale." Hidalgo v. Arizona, 583 U.S. ----, ----, ----, 138 S.Ct. 1054, 1055, 1057, 200 L.Ed.2d 496 (2018) (BREYER, J., statement respecting denial of certiorari). I recognize that only a small fraction of the roughly 8,000 death sentences imposed since 1976 have resulted in executions. Executions continue to decline from the modern peak of 98 ex…
Authorities Cited
- Gregg v. Georgia, 428 U.S. 153 (U.S. 1976)
- Furman v. Georgia, 408 U.S. 238 (U.S. 1972)
- Zant v. Stephens, 462 U.S. 862 (U.S. 1983)
- Jurek v. Texas, 428 U.S. 262 (U.S. 1976)
- California v. Ramos, 463 U.S. 992 (U.S. 1983)
- Lowenfield v. Phelps, 484 U.S. 231 (U.S. 1988)
- Tuilaepa v. California, 512 U.S. 967 (U.S. 1994)
- Kansas v. Marsh, 548 U.S. 163 (U.S. 2006)
- Brown v. Sanders, 546 U.S. 212 (U.S. 2006)