RIVERKEEPER, INC., ET AL., PETITIONERS,
v.
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY, ET AL.

U.S. | 2018-02-26
No. 17–446.
138 S. Ct. 1165 Supreme Court of the United States (2018) Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 200 L. Ed. 2d 314
Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • Madison v. Alabama, 139 S. Ct. 718 (U.S. 2019)
  • Mount Lemmon Fire Dist. v. Guido, 139 S. Ct. 22 (U.S. 2018)
    …v. Monclova, 920 F. 2d 360 (C.A.6 1990) (same), with this case, 859 F. 3d 1168 (C.A.9 2017) (state and local governments are covered by the ADEA regardless of their number of employees). We granted certiorari to resolve the conflict. 583 U.S. ----, 138 S.Ct. 1165, 200 L.Ed.2d 313 (2018). II For several reasons, we conclude that the words "also means" in § 630(b) add new categories of employers to the ADEA's reach. First and foremost, the ordinary meaning of "also means" is additive rather than clarifying.…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw