BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY, PETITIONER,
v.
MICHAEL D. LOOS.
BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY, PETITIONER,
MICHAEL D. LOOS.
138 S. Ct. 1988
Supreme Court of the United States (2018)
Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 201 L. Ed. 2d 246
Cited by 5 cases
Opinion
Full opinion text not available for this case.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
AIR & Liquid Sys. Corp. v. Devries, 139 S. Ct. 986 (U.S. 2019)…ld be used with the later-added asbestos-containing materials. Id. , at 240. We granted certiorari to resolve a disagreement among the Courts of Appeals about the validity of the bare-metal defense under maritime law. 584 U. S. ----, 138 S.Ct. 1990, 201 L.Ed.2d 246 (2018). Compare 873 F.3d 232 (case below), with Lindstrom v. A-C Prod. Liability Trust , 424 F.3d 488 (CA6 2005). II Article III of the Constitution grants the federal courts jurisdiction over maritime cases. Under 28 U. S. C. § 1333, the feder…
-
BNSF Ry. Co. v. Loos, 139 S. Ct. 893 (U.S. 2019)…ayment to an employee for working time lost due to an on-the-job injury taxable "compensation" under the RRTA, 26 U.S.C. § 3231(e)(1) ? We granted review to resolve a division of opinion on the answer to that question. 584 U.S. ----, 138 S.Ct. 1988, 201 L.Ed.2d 246 (2018). Compare Hance v. Norfolk S.R. Co. , 571 F.3d 511, 523 (C.A.6 2009) ("compensation" includes pay for time lost); Phillips v. Chicago Central & Pacific R. Co. , 853 N.W.2d 636, 650-651 (Iowa 2014) (agency reasonably interpreted "compensation…