BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY, PETITIONER,
v.
MICHAEL D. LOOS.

U.S. | 2018-05-14
No. 17–1042.
138 S. Ct. 1988 Supreme Court of the United States (2018) Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 201 L. Ed. 2d 246
Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Full opinion text not available for this case.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By

  • AIR & Liquid Sys. Corp. v. Devries, 139 S. Ct. 986 (U.S. 2019)
    …ld be used with the later-added asbestos-containing materials. Id. , at 240. We granted certiorari to resolve a disagreement among the Courts of Appeals about the validity of the bare-metal defense under maritime law. 584 U. S. ----, 138 S.Ct. 1990, 201 L.Ed.2d 246 (2018). Compare 873 F.3d 232 (case below), with Lindstrom v. A-C Prod. Liability Trust , 424 F.3d 488 (CA6 2005). II Article III of the Constitution grants the federal courts jurisdiction over maritime cases. Under 28 U. S. C. § 1333, the feder…
  • BNSF Ry. Co. v. Loos, 139 S. Ct. 893 (U.S. 2019)
    …ayment to an employee for working time lost due to an on-the-job injury taxable "compensation" under the RRTA, 26 U.S.C. § 3231(e)(1) ? We granted review to resolve a division of opinion on the answer to that question. 584 U.S. ----, 138 S.Ct. 1988, 201 L.Ed.2d 246 (2018). Compare Hance v. Norfolk S.R. Co. , 571 F.3d 511, 523 (C.A.6 2009) ("compensation" includes pay for time lost); Phillips v. Chicago Central & Pacific R. Co. , 853 N.W.2d 636, 650-651 (Iowa 2014) (agency reasonably interpreted "compensation…

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw