R.W., A JUVENILE, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Trespass In A Conveyance cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Appellant R.W. seeks reversal of the trial court’s order adjudicating him delinquent upon a finding that he committed the offenses of carrying a concealed firearm and trespass in a conveyance. We hold that the evidence was insufficient to support a finding that the juvenile committed these offenses. See Horton v. State, 442 So. 2d 1064 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983) (circumstantial evidence which fails to exclude reasonable hypothesis of innocence does not support conviction for trespass of a conveyance); Bailey v. State, 442 So. 2d 385 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983) (gun on floor of passenger side of car occupied by driver and defendant is insufficient evidence to support conviction for carrying a concealed weapon; reasonable hypothesis exists that driver carried and placed gun in car). Accordingly, we reverse the order and remand with directions to discharge appellant.
Reversed and remanded.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Commerce P'ship 8098 Ltd. P'ship & Forest-English, Inc. v. Equity Contracting Co., Inc., 695 So. 2d 383 (Fla. 4th DCA 1997)…Co., Inc. v. Sunshine Ready Concrete Co., 651 So. 2d 190 (Fla. 4th DCA 1995); Hillman Constr., 636 So. 2d at 577; Zaleznik, 576 So. 2d at 778; Henry M. Butler, Inc., 524 So. 2d at 710; Challenge Air Transport, Inc. v. Transportes Aereos Nacionales, 520 So. 2d 323 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988); Coffee Pot Plaza Partnership v. Arrow Air Conditioning & Refrigeration, Inc., 412 So. 2d 883, 884 (Fla. 2d DCA 1982). . Yates v. Bernard's Carpet and Draperies, Inc., 481 So. 2d 515, 516 (Fla. 4th DCA 1986). . Policastro, 420 S…
-
Henry M. Butler, Inc. v. Trizec Props., Inc., 524 So. 2d 710 (Fla. 2d DCA 1988)…only one. Appellant contends that the trial court erred in granting appel-lees’ motion for summary judgment on appellant’s unjust enrichment claim against appellees. We agree. In Challenge Air Transport, Inc. v. Transportes Aereos Nacionales, S.A., 520 So. 2d 323, 324-25, (Fla. 3d DCA 1988) the court stated: An action for “unjust enrichment” exists to prevent the wrongful retention of a benefit, or the retention of money or property of another, in violation of good conscience and fundamental principles of j…
-
Cap. Constr. Servs. v. Rubinson, 541 So. 2d 748 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989)…n for summary judgment raises genuine issues of material fact as to whether, even in the absence of privity, Mrs. Rubinson knowingly accepted the benefits conferred by Capital.3 See Challenge Air Transp., Inc. v. Transportes Aereos Nacionales, S.A., 520 So. 2d 323, 324 (Pla. 3d DCA 1988) (“While recovery does not rest upon the assent of the contracting parties, ... the party for whose benefit the services were rendered must have requested the services or have knowingly and voluntarily accepted their benefits[…
Previewing 3 of 5 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Turner v. State, 442 So. 2d 1064 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983)
- Anderson v. State, 442 So. 2d 385 (Fla. 2d DCA 1983)