ROBERT PEREZ, APPELLANT,
v.
THE STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
PER CURIAM.
After a full evidentiary hearing, the trial court concluded that defense counsel’s alleged deficiencies of failing to object to evidence presented by the state would, under proper objection, have been cured and overcome by the state, and that the remaining deficiencies were simply tactical in nature. More importantly, on the assumption that the deficiencies were established, the trial court nonetheless found that under the circumstances, they would not have altered the result. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 104 S.Ct. 2052, 80 L.Ed. 2d 674 (1984). The order denying the defendant’s motion for post-judgment relief made pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 is affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Samuel Friedland Fam. Enters. v. Amoroso, 630 So. 2d 1067 (Fla. 1994)…tive chain “who profit from the sale or distribution of [the product] to the public, rather than an innocent person injured by it, should bear the financial burden of even an undetectable product defect.” North Miami General Hosp., Inc. v. Goldberg, 520 So. 2d 650, 651 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988). Those entities are in a better position to ensure the safety of the products they market, to insure against defects in those products, and to spread the cost of any injuries resulting from a defect. This Court adopted the d…
-
Amoroso v. Samuel Friedland Fam. Enters., 604 So. 2d 827 (Fla. 4th DCA 1992)…ply to lessors has been addressed only briefly in Florida cases. In Futch v. Ryder Truck Rental, Inc., 391 So. 2d 808 (Fla. 5th DCA 1980), the court applied strict liability to a commercial lessor, and in North Miami General Hosp., Inc. v. Goldberg, 520 So. 2d 650 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988), the court noting that the doctrine had been applied in other consumer contexts including lease transactions, explained that: [TJhose who profit from the sale or distribution of a particular product to the public, rather than an…
-
NME Hosps., Inc. v. Azzariti, 573 So. 2d 173 (Fla. 2d DCA 1991)…nly in the course of its primary function of providing medical services is not subject to an action in strict liability where the professional services could not have been rendered without using the product. North Miami General Hospital v. Goldberg, 520 So. 2d 650 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988). Accordingly, we find that the circuit court’s order departed from the essential requirements of law. The petition for writ of certiorari is granted, and the case is remanded to the circuit court for proceedings consistent with…
Previewing 3 of 6 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668 (U.S. 1984)