THOMAS RAY MCDONALD, APPELLANT,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The trial court did not abuse its discretion in scoring the victim's injury as severe for guidelines scoresheet calculation.
Appellant was convicted of aggravated battery with a firearm after shooting a victim. The bullet passed through the victim's finger and lodged in his …
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Guidelines Scoresheet cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
This cause is before us on appeal of appellant’s jury conviction for aggravated battery with a firearm. The crime occurred after appellant hit a car in a bar parking lot in Crestview, Florida. While appellant was arguing with the owner about the damage, the victim verbally intervened. So, appellant shot him. The bullet passed through the victim’s right middle finger and lodged in his lower-right stomach. The victim bled profusely and was hospitalized. The bullet was not removed for fear of doing more damage. The sole issue on appeal is that the trial court erred when, in calculating appellant’s guidelines scoresheet, it assessed 36 points for severe injury. Appellant believes he should have received only 24 points for moderate injury. Appellant was sentenced under the guidelines to five and a half years’ imprisonment.
In Vandeneynden v. State, 478 So. 2d 429 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985), our sister court dealt with a similar situation. We quote:
Lastly, the appellant contends that the scoring of victim injury as a severe injury was in error. Scoring of victim injury is within the discretion of the trial court judge. See Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(7). The trial court had before it the information that the victim was shot directly in the left portion of the chest by a shotgun at extremely close range. Medical bills were over $5,000. Given these facts, the trial court did not abuse its discretion.
While, conceivably, the victim of a shooting might receive less than a severe injury, such is not the case here, and the trial court did not abuse its discretion in scoring the injury as “severe.”
AFFIRMED.
BOOTH, WIGGINTON and ZEHMER, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
ELY v. State, 719 So. 2d 11 (Fla. 2d DCA 1998)…CA 1992). One further point merits discussion. The trial court imposed 40 points for severe victim injury on Mr. Ely’s sentencing seoresheet. The imposition of victim injury points is within the discretion of the trial court. See McDonald v. State, 520 So. 2d 668 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988). The trial record contains victim injury evidence of a broken nose, chipped teeth, and bruises. Therefore, trial court did not abuse its discretion in assessing these points. Regardless, Mr. Ely has waived his right to bring this…
-
Bennett v. State, 971 So. 2d 196 (Fla. 1st DCA 2007)…for attempted sexual battery, because the jury did not specifically find that he had sexual contact with N.D.D. in committing this offense. A trial court’s order scoring victim injury points is reviewed for an abuse of discretion. McDonald v. State, 520 So. 2d 668 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988). The trial court calculated a 120-point score for sexual contact based on Appellant’s conviction of attempted sexual battery and two counts of lewd and lascivious molestation. The State argues that the nature of the attempted se…
-
Whiddon v. State, 539 So. 2d 586 (Fla. 1st DCA 1989)…a Statutes. The jury properly found appellant guilty of the two separate offenses. We find no merit in appellant’s argument that the trial court abused its discretion in scoring victim injury as severe. Fla.R.Crim.P. 3.701(d)(7); McDonald v. State, 520 So. 2d 668 (Fla. 1st DCA 1988); Vandeneynden v. State, 478 So. 2d 429 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985). In the instant case, the paramedic who transported McLeod testified that McLeod was in great pain and that the leg was deformed with a bone protruding. The injury was as…
Previewing 3 of 4 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Vandeneynden v. State, 478 So. 2d 429 (Fla. 5th DCA 1985)