THILO BROWN
v.
UNITED STATES.

U.S. | 2018-10-15
No. 17–9276.
139 S. Ct. 14 Supreme Court of the United States (2018) Positive Treatment
Also reported at: 202 L. Ed. 2d 302
Cited by 46 cases

AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.

Synopsis

The Supreme Court declined to hear Brown v. United States, a case involving the application of Johnson v. United States to federal sentencing law that had divided the courts of appeals and potentially affected over 1,000 pending cases. Justice [dissenting] argued the Court should have granted certiorari because the case presented an important, unsettled question of federal law with circuit split implications and significant consequences for numerous defendants' liberty interests.


© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.

Opinion of the Court

Regardless of where one stands on the merits of how far Johnson extends, this case presents an important question of federal law that has divided the courts of appeals and in theory could determine the liberty of over 1,000 people.4 That sounds like the kind of case we ought to hear. See this Court's Rules 10(a), (c).5 Because the Court nevertheless declines to do so, I respectfully dissent.


Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus


Citator

Cited By (25 total)

  • Stoney Lester v. United States, 921 F.3d 1306 (11th Cir. 2019)
    …id. at 413 (Scalia, J., dissenting); see also Stinson v. United States, 508 U.S. 36, 42 (1993) (“The principle that the Guidelines Manual is binding on federal courts applies as well to policy statements"). And just before 3 Brown v. United States, 139 S. Ct. 14, 16 n.4 (2018) (noting that there are likely at least 1,187 Johnson challenges to sentences under the pre-Booker career-offender clause). 4 The Pryor Statement expresses wonderment about whether the career-offender provision of could “somehow [be] u…
    1 / 2
  • Gipson v. United States, 139 S. Ct. 373 (U.S. 2018)
  • Wilson v. United States, 139 S. Ct. 374 (U.S. 2018)

Previewing 3 of 25 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.

Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence

Authorities Cited

Full citator, related cases, and AI research tools

Open in FLexlaw