PAUL L. MADSEN, PETITIONER,
v.
STATE OF FLORIDA, RESPONDENT
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The recording of conversations between a defendant and an undercover agent in the defendant's home does not violate the Fourth Amendment or Article I, Section 12 of the Florida Constitution.
The district court refused to suppress the recording of petitioner's conversation with an undercover officer in his home. The issue presented was iden…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Florida Constitution Article I, Section 12 cases and more on FLexlaw
OVERTON, Justice.
This is a petition to review Madsen v. State, 502 So. 2d 948 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987), in which the district court refused to suppress the recording of petitioner’s conversation with an undercover officer in the petitioner’s home. We accepted jurisdiction because the identical issue was before this Court on petition to review the lower court’s construction of the 1982 revision of article I, section 12, Florida Constitution, in State v. Hume, 463 So. 2d 499 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985). We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const. We have recently resolved the issue in our opinion in State v. Hume, 512 So. 2d 185 (Fla.1987), in which we held that “the recording of conversations between a defendant and an undercover agent in a defendant’s home ... does not violate the fourth amendment of the United States Constitution and, accordingly, does not violate the newly adopted article I, section 12, of the Florida Constitution.” Id. at 188. We also rejected the contention that our right-of-privacy provision under article I, section 23, of the Florida Constitution prohibited the introduction of this type of evidence.
We find no conflict with Winfield v. Division of Pari-Mutuel Wagering, 477 So. 2d 544 (Fla.1985).
In accordance with our decision in Hume, we approve the district court decision in the instant case.
It is so ordered.
MCDONALD, C.J., and EHRLICH, SHAW, GRIMES and KOGAN, JJ., concur. BARKETT, J., concurs in result only.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By (21 total)
-
Mac Ray Wright v. State, 586 So. 2d 1024 (Fla. 1991)…ble jeopardy principles apply to the penalty phase of capital punishment trials in Florida under section 921.141 of the Florida Statutes (1985), because the Florida procedure is comparable to a trial for double jeopardy purposes. See Brown v. State, 521 So. 2d 110 (Fla.), cert. denied, 488 U.S. 912, 109 S.Ct. 270, 102 L.Ed.2d 258 (1988); accord Arizona v. Rumsey, 467 U.S. 203, 104 S.Ct. 2305, 81 L.Ed.2d 164 (1984); Bullington v. Missouri, 451 U.S. 430, 101 S.Ct. 1852, 68 L.Ed.2d 270 (1981). Florida law also p…
-
Vermon T. Donald v. State, 562 So. 2d 792 (Fla. 1st DCA 1990)…it is said that the unlawful sentence is of no legal effect, allowing the court to correct the sentence by imposing the lawful term at any time the illegality is discovered, regardless of whether the correction involves an increase. Brown v. State, 521 So. 2d 110 (Fla.1988); Fasenmyer v. State, 457 So. 2d 1361 (Fla.1984); Beech v. State, 436 So. 2d 82 (Fla.1983); Troupe v. Rowe, 283 So. 2d 857 (Fla.1973); Daniels v. State, 513 So. 2d 244 (Fla. 2d DCA 1987); Padgett v. State, 497 So. 2d 724 (Fla. 1st DCA 1986…
-
Jones v. State, 559 So. 2d 204 (Fla. 1990)…sition of the initial fifty-year sentence, the district court of appeal would not have had the opportunity to apply that law had the petitioner not appealed the second sentence. Double jeopardy prohibits the increase of the sentence. Brown v. State, 521 So. 2d 110 (Fla.), cert. denied, — U.S. -, 109 S.Ct. 270, 102 L.Ed.2d 258 (1988); Troup v. [*207] Rowe, 288 So. 2d 857 (Fla.1973); Pearce. We agree with the petitioner that, while a departure sentence of more than three-to-seven years would stand because of th…
Previewing 3 of 21 citing cases — full citator treatment, depth of discussion, and citing context are member features.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligenceAuthorities Cited
- Winfield v. Division OF Pari-Mutuel Wagering, 477 So. 2d 544 (Fla. 1985)
- State v. Hume, 512 So. 2d 185 (Fla. 1987)
- State v. Hume, 463 So. 2d 499 (Fla. 1st DCA 1985)
- Madsen v. State, 502 So. 2d 948 (Fla. 4th DCA 1987)