HENRY RICCIO AND JEAN RICCIO, APPELLANTS,
v.
GOLD COAST CAPITAL CORP., APPELLEE
HENRY RICCIO AND JEAN RICCIO, APPELLANTS,
GOLD COAST CAPITAL CORP., APPELLEE
521 So. 2d 308
Florida District Court of Appeal, Third District (1988)
Positive Treatment
Cited by 2 cases
Opinion of the Court
PER CURIAM.
The record supports the trial court’s determination that the parties intended the Gold Coast Capital Corporation mortgage be superior to the Riccio purchase money second mortgage. We therefore affirm the Final Judgment. See Liza Danielle, Inc. v. Jamko, Inc., 408 So. 2d 735 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982); see also Tippett v. Frank, 238 So. 2d 671 (Fla. 3d DCA 1970).
Affirmed.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Riccio v. Stein, 559 So. 2d 1207 (Fla. 3d DCA 1990)…hat its mortgage had priority over the Riccios’ mortgage. The trial court found that the Riccios intended that the Gold Coast mortgage be superior to the Riccio purchase money second mortgage. This court affirmed. Riccio v. Gold Coast Capital Corp., 521 So. 2d 308 (Fla. 3d DCA 1988). Accordingly, Gold Coast received a final judgment of foreclosure.2 The Riccios subsequently brought this action against Stein and Rosenfeld3 for legal malpractice and for breach of warranty that their mortgage would have a first…
Authorities Cited
- Liza Danielle, Inc. v. Jamko, Inc., 408 So. 2d 735 (Fla. 3d DCA 1982)
- Tippett v. Cidell Frank, 238 So. 2d 671 (Fla. 3d DCA 1970)