THE FLORIDA BAR, COMPLAINANT,
v.
IRVING SCHULMAN, RESPONDENT
AI-generated. These summaries, headnotes, and key points are machine-generated and may contain errors or omissions. Always verify against the full opinion text below. Not legal advice.
The court granted the petition for leave to resign from The Florida Bar, subject to the condition of paying litigation costs and investigative expenses.
Irving Schulman petitioned for leave to resign from The Florida Bar without seeking readmission, with pending disciplinary proceedings. The Florida Ba…
The full statement of facts, procedural history, and disposition for this case are member content.
Join FLexlaw to unlock all legal intelligence© FLexlaw, Inc. — AI-generated enrichments are proprietary. All rights reserved.
Explore caselaw by topic → Browse Rules Regulating The Florida Bar, Rule 3-7.11 cases and more on FLexlaw
PER CURIAM.
Irving Schulman has filed a petition for leave to resign from membership in The Florida Bar under rule 3-7.11 of the Rules Regulating The Florida Bar. The petition states that resignation is sought without leave to apply for readmission.
The petition contains a statement of past and pending disciplinary proceedings in which respondent has been or is involved. In response to the petition, The Florida Bar has stated that it approves of respondent’s petition for leave to resign. We find that the standards governing resignations when disciplinary proceedings are pending are satisfied in this case. We therefore grant the petition for leave to resign.
The Florida Bar requests that acceptance of respondent’s resignation be made subject to the condition that he be required to pay the litigation costs and investigative and auditing expenses thus far incurred by the Bar in two pending disciplinary proceedings. We grant the request.
Irving Schulman is granted leave to resign permanently from The Florida Bar. The resignation shall take effect immedi ately. Judgment is entered against Irving Schulman for costs in the amount of $5,469.84, for which sum let execution issue.
It is so ordered.
McDonald, C.J., and OVERTON, EHRLICH, SHAW, BARKETT, GRIMES and KOGAN, JJ., concur.
Cases With Similar Vibessemantic neighbors from the corpus
Citator
Cited By
-
Murphy v. State, 708 So. 2d 612 (Fla. 1st DCA 1998)…e over our objection. THE COURT: All right. I understand. The Florida Supreme Court has previously addressed the issue of when an objection to the improper use of peremptories must be raised to qualify as a timely objection. See Blackshear v. State, 521 So. 2d 1088 (Fla.1988); State v. Castillo, 486 So. 2d 565 (Fla.1986). Specifically, in Castillo, the court indicated that an objection to the improper use of peremptories must be raised prior to the swearing of the jury: A second issue is whether the objection…